ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Star Trek Movies and related subjects
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bulldogtrekker
Space Sector Admiral


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1024
Location: Columbia,SC

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:59 pm    Post subject: Star Trek: Nemesis (2002) Reply with quote



by Nicole Berland, POPMATTERS

This article begins with a basic observation about the Star Trek timeline: that it ends.

Let me clarify. When Star Trek: The Original Series (hereafter TOS) aired in 1966, it was set in the year 2266, exactly 300 years into Earth's future. From there, the timeline jumped forward, with 1987's Star Trek: The Next Generation set in 2364, nearly a century after TOS. The franchise then continued at a steady pace through both Deep Space Nine and Voyager. Between the first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation and the Voyager final, 14 years passed in the lives of Trek's characters and actors alike.

Then something funny happened. When Star Trek: Enterprise debuted in 2001, it looked back to Star Trek's past for its inspiration. The upcoming Star Trek: Discovery will likewise explore the Federation's origins, leaving Star Trek's future to play out only in our imaginations.



The franchise's filmic output tells a similar story. From 1979's Star Trek: The Motion Picture to 2002's Nemesis, each of Star Trek's initial ten films moved the Trek timeline forward, despite First Contact's foray to the 21st century. After Nemesis, however, the films also abandoned the Federation's future, opting instead for the high-octane, high-budget TOS reboots. Despite the fact that the Star Trek franchise continues to produce new content, the Star Trek timeline appears to have been closed.

My question, then, is simply: Why? What is it about this moment in time that renders the Star Trek franchise incapable, unwilling, or merely uninterested in envisioning its own future?....

MORE at this link:
http://www.popmatters.com/feature/star-trek-and-the-problem-with-b4-and-after-2379/


Last edited by bulldogtrekker on Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17018
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

__________________________________

I enjoyed this movie, and I own the DVD.
__________________________________


________________ Star Trek: Nemesis - trailer


_________

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:01 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gord Green
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 2940
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Supposedly Gene Roddenberry's ANDROMEDA was the future of a STAR TREK "possible universe".

The story begins around a thousand years after the Federation was replaced by the Commonwealth and then jumps 300 years beyond that when anarchy had taken over.

Other than the posthumous contribution of Gene's notes there is no other real connection between the two except in conjecture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17018
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2023 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

______________________________________________

I really enjoy the TNG movies, but Nemesis is generally considered to be the weakest of the four. Today, I enjoyed a triple feature of First Contact, Insurrection, and Nemesis and decided to list my major objections to the last one.

I doubt if I'll get any arguments on these points, but I'm sure a few more criticisms will be added.

Criticisms #1 - The ridiculous low-tech dune buggy used on the planet where the Data prototype was found

In the 23rd century, the idea that an Away Team would bounce around on a planet with extremely rough terrain in a four-wheeled vehicle after arriving in an advanced shuttle craft is ridiculous.

What were the the filmmakers thinking?

Criticism #2 - The inclusion of a character who is a clone of Picard, and yet who is dying because of the way he was cloned.

We're presented with a sort of "son" of Picard — but he hates Picard and wants to destroy him. Even the Romulans don't approve of the kid's animosity . . . so the whole "conflict" of the story is muddled. Rolling Eyes

Criticism #3- The Enterprise determines that Shinzon plans to use the powerful starship called the Scimitar to invade the Federation, using its thalaron radiation generator to eradicate all life on Earth.

I read the Wikipedia plot summary, and I still can't figure out why the villain wants to wipe out all life on Earth.

Oh well . . . Rolling Eyes

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sun Apr 23, 2023 10:55 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ralfy
Mission Specialist


Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Check out the intro of the Scimitar and the music here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1BnyUANoHo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Space Ranger


Joined: 19 Feb 2023
Posts: 190

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:

Criticisms #1 - The ridiculous low-tech dune buggy used on the planet where the Data prototype was found

In the 23rd century, the idea that an Away Team would bounce around on a planet with extremely rough terrain in a four-wheeled vehicle after arriving in an advanced shuttle craft is ridiculous.

Apparently by TNG the Federation had lost their anti-gravity capabilities. I wonder what happened to the floating city.

David.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmlindsey
Mission Specialist


Joined: 18 Jul 2022
Posts: 409
Location: NW Florida

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
Criticisms #1 - The ridiculous low-tech dune buggy used on the planet where the Data prototype was found

That was inserted for Patrick Stewart; he loves dune buggies so they put it in to entice him to do the movie (which he was considering not doing).

I remember nothing else specifically about the film besides THAT and Data's phony death.

_________________
"Have you never wondered what it would be like to walk between the ticks and tocks of Time?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jonathan Frakes: "We had John Logan who's an A-list writer. We had what was a great company back together again. Tom Hardy was a brilliant guest star. My take it on it, though, was there was not enough of the family. It was a little too much of Shinzon and not enough of Picard and Data. The front end of Nemesis' was the wedding of Riker and Troi and which was so charming and it just got cut to bits. We originally had Whoopi Goldberg and Wil Wheaton and all these Easter eggs in there, and Brent Spiner sang. It was a big deal that got cut up to nothing."

"It didn't help that director Stuart Baird was trying to reinvent the wheel. I called him and said if there's anything I can do to help you, let me know. I've been around these people for years, we're really here to help you. In retrospect, it seems like arrogance. Why wouldn't you accept that kind of offer?'

Marina Sirtis, "The director was an idiot."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Star Trek Movies and related subjects All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group