ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FEATURED THREADS for 7-11-23

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> What's New at All Sci-Fi
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17104
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 12:25 pm    Post subject: FEATURED THREADS for 7-11-23 Reply with quote



If you're not a member of All Sci-Fi, registration is easy. Just use the registration password, which is —

gort



Attention members! If you've forgotten your password, just email me at Brucecook1@yahoo.com.
____________________________________________________________________

Bogmeister’s analysis of is highly enjoyable movie is right on target. He accurately describes both its virtues and its faults, and he right when he states that, in effect, it’s so much fun that the faults are forgiviable. Very Happy
____________________________________________________________________

Independence Day (1996)

____________
______________________

This is a consistently entertaining piece of entertainment from start to finish.

Take the arrival of the huge ships, halting to hover over the big cities. Yes, not really new. But, it's done right. The filmmakers could have blown it — having various people ignore the ships or act really stupid, or having foolish fainting scenes or people vomiting. But, they did it right — there was a sense of awe about these scenes. There was a later home video release (LD & DVD) that had an extra 8 or 9 minutes to it, btw.

___

The first thing that hostile critics of this film point out is the whole issue about hacking into the aliens' computers.

Everyone from Harlan Ellison to would-be computer programmers raised hell about this, and I think many just jumped on that bandwagon.

There's an alternative view on this and it's why I was not too upset about it. I had a debate with a friend a dozen years ago about this and other "silly" (my friend's words) stuff in the film; by short reply was — this is was a popcorn flick, a crowd-pleaser. My friend was really in 'serious' mode back then (which means he was in a bad mood most of the time, looking for a job, etc.) and has since mellowed out. Could that be the reason for the different approaches to this film? I'm not sure.




But, in my view, the main reason this was such a success and is so watchable is the cast. It's a big cast (meaning many speaking roles) and there are no weak parts, except maybe Randy Quaid — I guess I never liked drunks in film; it's tiresome. Goldblum is usually singled out and is a standout. Will Smith first showed his star power here.



Pullman was good as the Prez, a former soldier & pilot, so an ideal version of that sap Clinton; he wasn't as good as most of the others, but I liked his speech near the end — it worked, it was inspiring. Margaret Colin was almost my favorite actress back then. Loggia is another favorite and just right as the general. Rebhorn was superb as the weaselly defense secretary. Hirsch was funny with every line of his dialog. Vivica Fox was... quite foxy. The list goes on & on; even the small, brief roles were nicely done, such as Adam Baldwin as the Area 51 officer.



There are some minor problems, and one of those — the first that springs to mind — is the loopy character played by Brent Spiner, who is almost as bad as the idiot played by Quaid. There is funny (Hirsch) and then there is painfully unfunny and way over-the-top. I like Spiner as an actor but here, though he's supposed to be the preeminent scientist of the late 20th century, he comes across like some goofball, pretending to be a scientist. Goldblum's character makes a fool of him and I guess that's easy to do. How the hell did this guy (Spiner's scientist) stay in charge of Area 51? In most of his scenes, he's making some stupid remarks and the other characters either roll their eyes or tell him to shut up.



There were no dopey characters interrupting the flow of more serious invasion tales like the original War of the Worlds (or the remake for that matter).



So, it's a bit uneven in places, maybe a little lopsided here-&-there. But, there are reasons why I watch this once a year. It goes well with popcorn and makes you forget about the real world for a couple of hours.


BoG's Score: 8 out of 10


BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> What's New at All Sci-Fi All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group