ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Soylent Green (1973)
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies from 1970 to 2000
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:07 pm    Post subject: Soylent Green (1973) Reply with quote




SOYLENT GREEN - (1973) In the prologue to "Make Room, Make Room", Harry Harrison's grim novel about over-population, he states that in the next few decades America's consumption of the world's natural resources will actually pass the 100% mark.

In other words, if we maintain our present standard of living, we'll need more resources than the world can provide. This, Harrison points out, is not only a mathematical impossibility, it ignores the fact that the rest of the world might want some of those resources, too.

"Soylent Green" is based on Harrison's novel, a near-future story that takes a look at life in the big city after things have begun to fall seriously apart.

Edward G. Robinson is wonderful as Heston's elderly friend, a man who remembers a Golden Age of prosperity and plenty (in other words, our present world). Directed by Richard Fleischer.

"Soylent Green" is the third film in Heston's highly enjoyable trilogy of sci-fi tales that includes "Planet of the Apes" and "The Omega Man". All three films foretell the doom of humanity. In addition to being a splendid actor, Mr. Heston has a real knack for playing prophets.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:37 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bogmeister
Galactic Fleet Vice Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 574

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:59 pm    Post subject: What IS Soylent Green? Reply with quote

WHAT IS THE SECRET OF SOYLENT GREEN?

starring CHARLTON HESTON
LEIGH TAYLOR-YOUNG co-starring CHUCK CONNORS * BROCK PETERS * JOSEPH COTTEN * EDWARD G.ROBINSON


Directed by RICHARD FLEISCHER



I've always liked this extrapolation on future events, predicting that by the year of this film, 2022, New York City would have about 40 million people.

OK, so it looks like they went a bit overboard. But, I like all the details of future life presented here, all associated with the theme of overpopulation.

The film has many moments, such as the scarcity of food we currently take for granted and the lack of living accommodations, that present a compelling picture overall. We see all this through the day-to-day existence of the main characters: Heston as a cop; Robinson as his 'book'; Taylor-Young as 'furniture' (note how some people are referred to as things).

I remember when I saw previews of this film as a kid, in the early seventies. The scenes were of those giant scoops picking up crowds of people and tossing them in the backs of special trucks. Wow, I thought, that looks wild.

Indeed, I like the entire atmosphere of this film; the city swelters under the long-predicted greenhouse effect, so everyone sweats.

There's not much of that futuristic technology, such as flying cars, with the have-nots contenting themselves with hand-me-downs from past decades (the quaint little TV set in Heston's apartment). There's none of that unrealistic futurism, as if all the super-advanced stuff came about magically. This film hasn't dated. At least, not yet.



This was the final film of Edward G. Robinson and maybe the best thing about this film is his and Heston's performances, in a father-son relationship. Not too long ago, I noted some comments on IMDb by (presumably) younger posters asking if these two characters were in a homosexual relationship. I couldn't understand where they came up with that idea.

Then, when I re-watched this recently, I realized what scene prompted such juvenile speculation. Early in the film, Heston's character is leaving the apartment and Robinson gently pats Heston's chin, also saying "But you love me."

It is, of course, a fatherly gesture, at a time when men were not afraid to show signs of affection, especially older gentlemen such as Robinson, who easily contributed an Oscar-worthy performance here.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bongopete
Interstellar Explorer


Joined: 17 Dec 2013
Posts: 76
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

These days there is a lot of attempts at 'seeing' homosexual happenings between characters in older films.

It's a very strange thing indeed.

I recently saw a movie just a few months ago where a character says 'Soylent Green is People'. So, our movie certainly has made an impression.

The movie of course is mainly a murder mystery, that sort of morphs into a political conspiracy one.

The underlying thread, which I think is only mentioned once...and which has lead to the processing of dead into Soylent Green is the fact that the oceans are now dead.

How long could a world (anyone remember if a population number is mentioned?) how long could society exist on Soylent Green?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Always admired Heston for doing SG, along with the 2 Apes films & Omega Man.

While they may not all be masterpieces, he was one of the very few actors at his level that would even consider doing an sf film.

Most kept away from sf at that time. SF films were not a highly respected genre even though such classics as The Day The Earth Stood Still, Forbidden Planet, The Thing From Another World, among others, should have proven that sf was an intelligent genre deserving respect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh my goodness yes, I enjoy Heston's sci-fi efforts very much. The Omega Man holds some very fond memories — like, me and a young lady at a drive (actually watching the movie, 'cause we were marred Very Happy). She had some nice comments to make during the film.

Like, "He's so starved for the sight of crowds, he watches Woodstock every few weeks."

It's ironic that Heston was in one movie about the world's population being wiped out by a plague and another one about a world strangling from over-population! Shocked

Solylent Green is a grim-but-enjoyable movie. I refuse to eatgreen crackers because of it. Ah, but green eggs and ham — that's a different story! (No pun intended . . . )

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:23 am; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Considering the conditions and food situation in the movie's world, you have to wonder if C.H. is doing society any favors by revealing the source of Soylent Green.

David.
Back to top
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Krel wrote:
Considering the the conditions, and food situation in the movie's world, you have to wonder if C.H. is doing society any favors by revealing the source of Soylent Green.

It's easy for me to make noble statements when I've got a fridge full of food, but I feel that just surviving, no matter what it takes, shouldn't be enough for mankind as a race.

If mankind has reached the point where we have to turn corpses into Cheez-its, we're not working hard to enough to solve the essential problem. And in Soylent Green, the ruling elite who control the resources seem comfortable with the crappy solution they've come up with.

Any society that relies heavily on propaganda to convince the public to accept the status quo . . . has one lousy status quo.

I'd just go on and on about this with lots of pictures and links and a music soundtrack from YouTube like I usually do — but suddenly I'm hungry and need a snack.
Very Happy
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sun Mar 04, 2018 5:13 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ralfy
Mission Specialist


Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read the book, but found the movie much better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did not read the book but enjoyed watching Leigh-Taylor Young. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pow wrote:
I did not read the book but enjoyed watching Leigh-Taylor Young. Wink

Wait, Leigh who?

Oh, right . . . her.



By gum, a picture is worth a thousand words!
Very Happy
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:18 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert (Butch) Day
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1437
Location: Arlington, WA USA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And while watching that "Soylent Goodie" don't forget to eat your Soylent Red:



Our fine products are enhanced with Soylent Yellow:



New to the Soylent Green line are:









Be sure to drink plenty of Soylent Blue:



BREAKING NEWS! Now Soylent Green is a drink!



(Based upon Green River pop — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_River_%28soft_drink%29 — my favorite!)

Pye-rate loves them all!



[Picture of actor Nigel Green who played Hercules in Jason and the Argonauts (1963). Pye-rate looks like this except his face is wider.]

_________________
Common Sense ISN'T Common
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pow wrote:
Always admired Heston for doing SG, along with the 2 Apes films & Omega Man.

Most kept away from sf at that time.

Isn't it ironic that for many decades the situation among the Hollywood crowd was exactly as you described! Sad

And yet, these days the biggest blockbusters are science fiction, and actors are even chompin' at the bit to be cast in superhero movies . . . which were considered less worthy of their talents than sci-fi until fairly recently!

My, how times change. Rolling Eyes

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud, I believe that the majority of people saw science~fiction as superficial,and somewhat silly, entertainment primarily aimed at kids and teens.

Folks figured at that time producers couldn't make anything more out of sci~fi than Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers serials.

So sci~fi was the Rodney Dangerfield of film genres. It got no respect, no respect at all.

In spite of such enthralling & profound sci~fi movies that popped up early such as Metropolis, Things To Come, Forbidden Planet, The Day The Earth Stood Still to name a few, the audiences weren't swayed regarding the validity of this genre.

Slowly, inch-by-inch sci~fi gained respect and the awareness that it can tell stories just as rich,deep,and intellectual as any other genre.

Television had the same hurtle to overcome convincing audiences that sci~fi mattered and made for excellent commentaries on our society whether here on Earth,or on a faraway world.

Rod Serling, Leslie Stevenson & Joseph Stephano, Gene Roddenberry all made valiant efforts to show how amazing & serious sci~fi could be.

It wasn't just an uphill battle against public opinion. It was also attempting to show the thoughtful side of sci~fi while competing with juvenile sci~films and television series being produced.

Irwin Allen's TV shows are clearly one such example. I grew up with those series, enjoyed them, still marvel at the lavish production values they had.

However, they were shallow. You don't look at his shows for fascinating plots, rich character development, or commentary on complex societal issues.

Not that Allen ever intended his productions to do anything other than entertain kids and adults like a three-ring circus does. Entertaining they were but little else was offered.

His productions, his choice. I don't mean to attack his shows but realistically he did not advance thoughtful sci~fi either.

Again, it's the way he wanted it & that's what we got.

But every genre faces that some films & TV shows will be fantastic, some good, then fair, and the rest poor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

Sadly, I agree. Sad

And I'll add the obvious fact that Hollywood caused the public to have that low opinion of science fiction, simply because the vast majority of what they gave us was the low-budget, low-brow kind! Even in the Gold Age of Sci-Fi, we only got a few really good ones each year.

Go to All Sci-Fi's Chronological Index of movies by release dates and look at the list of movie for 1958, the most prolific year of the fifties, with almost 50 films released!

How many of those do I consider good? About six. And not a single one of the those moves are big A-list productions! Sad

However, I think that the explosion CGI special effects should get a lot of the credit for Hollywood's ability to produce science fiction movies which the public has embraced.

Let's be honest, folks — when we were kids we enjoyed the flawed FX and loved the concepts. When we got older, we forgave the flawed FX and understood the concepts even better. We walked into the theaters already sold on sci-if — in fact, we were starving for it!

We love Harryhausen's amazing scenes in Earth vs the Flying Saucers because (a) we love stop motion, and (b) we're excited by the concept of a sky filled with alien invaders.

However, the average person doesn't jump for joy when faced with either of those elements in a movie. If the FX look fake to them, they don't buy the premise.

But along came ID4 with amazing FX of mother ships looming over American cities — looking totally realistic — and the public flocked to see the movie!

We, the devoted few who get excited just reading about such ideas, don't need totally realistic presentations to be thrilled by them.

But it sure doesn't hurt! Cool

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Krel wrote:
Considering the conditions and food situation in the movie's world, you have to wonder if C.H. is doing society any favors by revealing the source of Soylent Green.

Interesting comment, David.

I started wondering what benefit, if any, would come from the revelation that mankind had sunk so low we were reduced to eating —


______________________ Cannibal Crackers!

Maybe they could market them like they do with these and make them a bit more appealing. After all, the name even rhymes! Shocked


_________
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies from 1970 to 2000 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group