ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Dr. No (1962)
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17018
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:31 pm    Post subject: Dr. No (1962) Reply with quote

____


The first James Bond movie is modestly budgeted compared to the later films, but the basic formula was well developed from the start. Sean Connery was born to play the suave British Secret Service agent created by Ian Fleming, a role Connery won after the producers saw him in Disney's 1959 Darby O'Gill and the Little People.



In the premiere film of this long-running series, Bond goes up against a nefarious oriental mastermind (Joseph Wiseman) who operates from a Caribbean island stronghold which takes control of rockets being launched from Cape Canaveral. Connery and his gorgeous ally (Ursula Andress) manage to blow up Dr. No's fortress and escape in a small boat, where they make love until being rescued (a Bond tradition repeated in several of the subsequent films).








The recurring character of Felix Leiter is originated here by Jack Lord, future Hawaii Five-O star. A different actor played Felix in almost every Bond film. David Hedison (The Fly) is the only actor who played Leiter twice (Live and Let Die and License to Kill). Bernard Lee and Lois Maxwell (as "M" and Miss Moneypenny respectively) stayed with the series through most of the Roger Moore films. Directed by Terence Young.

Composer John Barry found a steady job doing Bond music for the next thirty years, although he was occasionally replaced by others.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Mon Dec 25, 2017 10:51 am; edited 6 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17018
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

I'm not impressed with Britished trailers for the early Bonds films. This one is a fairly good example of why. The Sean Connery narration was not a great idea. Sad

__________________________________


__________________________ Dr. No - trailer


____________

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17018
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

__________________________________

After watching Angelina Jolie in Salt (a great movie), I found myself in a Bond mood, so I went looking for things to say about some of my favorites. (I also did one for Goldfinger.)

IMDB has some interesting trivia items for this landmark film. Very Happy
__________________________________

All the sets and furniture were slightly smaller than they would be in reality, so that Bond would look larger.

After viewing the film, James Bond creator Ian Fleming reportedly described it as being, "Dreadful. Simply dreadful."

A Francisco de Goya painting of the Duke of Wellington, stolen in 1961, is found on an easel next to the stairs in Dr. No's dining area, which is why Bond stops to notice it as he passes it while going up the stairs. It was recovered in 1965.

The famous pose of Sean Connery holding a gun across his chest had to be redone at the last second. The Walther PPK was left at the studio, but the photographer had an old air pistol in his car. The gun in the picture is the air pistol.


(Note from me: Ironically the artist who designed the first 007 logo seems to have used the air gun instead of the Walther PPK as well! It was changed to look more like the correct pistol in later years. Very Happy)

____________
___________

When James Bond sings "Under the Mango Tree" in this movie, it is the only time James Bond sings in a Bond movie.


(Note from me: Now ain't that just ironic? Sean's brief singing in Dr. No is pretty bad — and yet his singing in Darby O'Gill and the Little People is actually quite good!

And Connery was cast as Bond after the producers saw Connery in Darby O'Gill!
Shocked

__________ Sean Connery Singing in Darby O'Gil


__________

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Feb 28, 2018 9:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Doctor No" must have been a hard movie for Sean Connery. Not only was he EXTREMELY arachnophobia, to the point where he would not even allow the robo tarantula near him, he is also claustrophobic. So you know that the air duct scenes were fun for him. S. C. said that because of his claustrophobia, the SCUBA scenes in "Thunderball" were very difficult for him. The diving mask triggered his claustrophobia!

In the novel, the air duct escape turned out to be a trap, where Bond was put through all kinds of tests. There was no explanation for that in the movie.

David.
Back to top
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17018
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Krel wrote:
"Doctor No" must have been a hard movie for Sean Connery. Not only was he EXTREMELY arachnophobia, to the point where he would not even allow the robo tarantula near him, he is also claustrophobic.

"Robo" tarantula? Confused
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:

"Robo" tarantula? Confused

Robo Tarantula is my name for it. A few years back during the big 007 prop sell off, they put the mechanical spider up for auction. As I said Sean Connery has extreme arachnophobia, and wouldn't allow a real tarantula near him. So the production made a mechanical spider for the scene, but S. C. couldn't stand it either. I don't know if this is true, but they claim that the scene of the spider crawling on his arm is an optical effect. S. C. couldn't handle a spider that close, even with a sheet of glass between the two.

Bob Hope had no such problems, as he insisted that they copy the scene in "Call Me Bwana".

If you look at Bond's pistol in "Doctor No", it usually isn't a Walther PPK, it is the PPK's older big brother, the Walther PP.

David.
Back to top
Gord Green
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 2940
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



A Walther PPK

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bulldogtrekker
Space Sector Admiral


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1024
Location: Columbia,SC

PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote



A BTS photo of the two stars of Doctor No.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Custer
Space Sector Commander


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 932
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice - and here's a more crowded behind-the-scenes shot:

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
alltare
Quantum Engineer


Joined: 17 Jul 2015
Posts: 351

PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr. No is my favorite Bond movie, mainly because it was made before the "gadget creep" (and then the "completely unbelievable gadget creep") of the later crop of 007 flicks. In fact, I gave up on this series after Thunderball and have not seen most of the movies that came after it. Besides, if Sean Connery isn't the star, then it's just not a Bond movie.

(Bud's right. If you have not seen "Salt", you have missed a good movie).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gord Green
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 2940
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, this movie STARTED the Bond craze! Aside from it being revealed that it was President John F Kennedy's favorite reading material the story was FIRST introduced in the DC SHOWCASE comic (above) to the kid level reading audience.

The comic....and then the movie....started a thirst for the Bond legend! Heck, it even made me look for the PLAYBOY issues that serialized Ian Fleming's novels pre-publication in book form! (No...I NEVER looked at the pictures!)

Still, this movie was a precursor to the best of the Bonds, FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE and GOLDFINGER.
As a first introduction to the genre it was a guilty pleasure!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Custer
Space Sector Commander


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 932
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wikipedia mentions that "In 1962 the American men's magazine Stag serialised the story, renaming it as 'Nude Girl of Nightmare Key'."

In one of the footnotes, Wikipedia says "British publisher Gilberton Publications... approached DC Comics about publishing its adaptation of Ian Fleming's bestselling novel Dr. No in the U.S. The movie of the novel was a box-office smash in the U.K., so DC agreed to publish the James Bond story." I guess that the British branch of Gilberton outlived its U.S. parent, which had stopped producing new Classics Illustrated in 1962, and published British-made adaptations... hence the UK price on that cover reproduction. Unusual for DC to reprint a story like that - the Showcase issue, #43, has a cover-date of April 1963. The interior artist is Norman Nodel, while Bob Brown did the cover for DC.

Would the movie have been more successful in the USA if the distributors had used the Stag title, I wonder...?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17018
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

When I first saw that several new comments had been added to the Dr. No thread my first thought was to share my opinion that the first James Bond movie is (forgive me for saying this) so badly dated it's hard to enjoy these days.

For me, it's difficult to understand how this relatively low budget movie managed to jump-start a world-wide spy craze that thrilled the world . . . including yours truly as a fourteen-year-old kid who constructed his own shoulder holster out of strips of elastic from Mom's sewing basket, thin cardboard from the package a new dress shirt came in, and black electricians tape to cover the cardboard.

I wore my crude creation to church under the coat of my Sunday suit, unbeknownst to my parents and the deceptively innocent-looking congregation who undoubtedly included Russian agents studying American social customs! Little did they know that I was among them, spying on the spies.

My name? Brewster. Bud . . . Brewster. Cool

My gun was a blank "starter pistol" similar to this one.



_______________


As for the dreaded "gadget creep" alltare mentioned, I must confess that the generous supply of hi-tech gadgets which Bond was able to pull out unexpectedly — like Batman's bottomless utility belt — was the main appeal of the Bond craze for me!

It was a little like having super powers . . . in your pocket! Very Happy

And as for Sean Connery being the James Bond, I agree that he was absolutely perfect in Goldfinger, and he did his best in all the rest of his Bond outings — but the only one which really shines is Goldfinger.

Unfortunately, I thought casting poor George Lazenby as Bond was like substituting soy milk for pure cream, and I didn't care for Roger Moore one little bit. He was like an Elvis impersonator who could say "Thank you . . . thank you very much" like Elvis — but he couldn't sing worth a damn.

Timothy Dalton didn't work either, although I'm not really sure why. Maybe it was because he was tough enough, but not suave enough.

However, Pierce Brosnan is absolutely perfect (in my humble opinion), and his movies combine the best of what made the Bond movies so successful in the first place.



__________
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Feb 28, 2018 9:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Custer
Space Sector Commander


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 932
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The first movie of the franchise does have its good points.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
John Thiel
Planetary Explorer


Joined: 25 Nov 2016
Posts: 28
Location: Lafayette, Indiana

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:32 pm    Post subject: Bottled in Bond Reply with quote

Sean Connery's facial features have always seemed disproportionate to me, the various parts not working together harmoniously. Perhaps this is due to the way he mugs a reaction to something in the film that's supposed to affect him. He is always shown in the publicity fondling a gun, which doesn't make him look really admirable. In this film Ursula Andress looked dowdy and plastered rather than gorgeous, which is apparently said over the same thing I'm looking at. She also seemed awkward most of the time. For me this makes the film into an existential situation in which the characters don't relate to their environment. Also the bullets when shown always are dum-dum bullets, which don't penetrate a body with very great ease.

Most every Bond film except Casino Royale (I have a copy of the book to prove this one existed) has a science fiction element, for example the atomic bomb in Goldfinger, the machinery in Dr. No, but the only one that came really close to actually being science fiction was Moonraker, which had a sort of science fiction plot going on. Dr. No was somewhat like a horror fantasy in the Sax Rohmer tradition, with that sf element where the doctor had space program interference equipment. But the important thing, as in all espionage books, is how bad he was and how he was messing with the government.
_________________
How do you do, folks? I sure am glad to see y'alls.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group