ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Tingler (1959)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17105
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

______________________________________________

Ah well, with the help of two of my learned colleagues, we've established the scene was NOT filmed in black & white with rotoscoped red blood. Laughing

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1876

PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I must agree with the bathroom sequence being less sharp than the preceding footage. Not only less sharp, but with halation around the actress' hair as well. To me it had the appearance of videotape.

In the first view of the blood flowing in the sink at 2:21 there is a very slight red tint around the basin area and the vertical backsplash in addition to the slight red spilling onto her robe, mentioned earlier.

I was also noticing the inside of her mouth being gray (before reading tmlindsey's mention of it).

Nowadays black liquid is often seen in color horror movies. In the days when b/w movies were common, black liquid was the accepted depiction of blood. Chocolate syrup was frequently the stand-in for blood. Now take a look at this partial frame. The blood right under the faucet is black, as though it missed being colorized with the rest of the tub's contents. This also shows up in some frames with the hand showing spots of black.



I'm thinking the bathroom scene was shot originally in b/w, with the red being added in post-production.

_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17105
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

______________________________________________

Gosh, folks, now I don't know what to think. Confused

I keep finding sites that support the "color film" explanation for the bathroom scene.

Here's another site that claims it was shot with color film.
______________________________________________

TVTropes.com

The Bloody Bathtub scene, featuring a vivid red arm emerging from a sea of blood in an otherwise black and white film was not colorized after the fact.

Instead, William Castle simulated a monochrome look by painting the set in gray, had the wardrobe done in gray and put gray makeup and hair-dye on the actress. The whole scene was indeed shot in color, but only the water and the arm had any actual color about them.

______________________________________________

But some very knowledgeable folks on the Classic Horror Film Board describe several complex methods for creating the shot. Read about it here.

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/monsterkidclassichorrorforum/the-tingler-1959-t2507-s160.html

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmlindsey
Mission Specialist


Joined: 18 Jul 2022
Posts: 409
Location: NW Florida

PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most websites (especially these days) simply parrot what other sites post. Most times, if you dig around, the information can be traced to one original source that everyone else takes as fact and re-posts. Once enough people re-post it, it becomes accepted "fact" that no one bothers to research and verify because "so many sites agree".

How many decades did the 2 endings to King Kong vs Godzilla claim last in books, magazines and on the web before finally being debunked? And yet is STILL sometimes gets posted on some sites as fact.

Also, Hollywood types tend to lie to make things sound more impressive or groundbreaking than they are (Dino's 40' robot Kong, for example).

The Tingler is old enough that it's likely impossible to really know how it was done since there's (probably) no one left alive who worked on it.

_________________
"Have you never wondered what it would be like to walk between the ticks and tocks of Time?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1876

PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
I keep finding sites that support the "color film" explanation for the bathroom scene.

The Internet is filled with "facts" that are merely repeated from other places on the 'net. Very few will cite authoritative sources.
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17105
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

______________________________________________

Agreed, guys. I stand corrected.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scotpens
Starship Captain


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 874
Location: The Left Coast

PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tmlindsey wrote:
Most websites (especially these days) simply parrot what other sites post. Most times, if you dig around, the information can be traced to one original source that everyone else takes as fact and re-posts. Once enough people re-post it, it becomes accepted "fact" that no one bothers to research and verify because "so many sites agree".

Like how it was believed for decades that this lovely lady was Victoria Vetri (aka Angela Dorian), when in fact it was an actress named April Tatro.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmlindsey
Mission Specialist


Joined: 18 Jul 2022
Posts: 409
Location: NW Florida

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

scotpens wrote:
Like how it was believed for decades that this lovely lady was Victoria Vetri (aka Angela Dorian), when in fact it was an actress named April Tatro.

Exactly. Just like most people believe All Sci-Fi is run by a mild-mannered SF fan when we all know that "Bud Brewster" is really the code name for dashing international man of mystery Bruce Cook; a King to men and a God to his women. Whose catchphrase when battling an enemy is "Now we're Cook-in'!" and often cries "Your goose is Cook-ed!" when dispatching a villain.

If the world only knew the truth.

_________________
"Have you never wondered what it would be like to walk between the ticks and tocks of Time?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17105
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

______________________________________________

"I'm Bud Brewster, and I approve this message." Very Happy


________________
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maurice
Mission Specialist


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 485
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2023 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tmlindsey wrote:
Most websites (especially these days) simply parrot what other sites post. Most times, if you dig around, the information can be traced to one original source that everyone else takes as fact and re-posts. Once enough people re-post it, it becomes accepted "fact" that no one bothers to research and verify because "so many sites agree".

How many decades did the 2 endings to King Kong vs Godzilla claim last in books, magazines and on the web before finally being debunked? And yet is STILL sometimes gets posted on some sites as fact.

Also, Hollywood types tend to lie to make things sound more impressive or groundbreaking than they are (Dino's 40' robot Kong, for example).

The Tingler is old enough that it's likely impossible to really know how it was done since there's (probably) no one left alive who worked on it.

The internet is chock full of bullsh*t. And pop culture history is rarely good "history" at all. Fannish theories and rumors and long after-the-fact anecdotes based on faulty human memory ensure it is so. People uncritically repeating what they've read or telling it from memory virtually ensures it's all a game of "telephone." And, honestly, when you dig up the actual truth, a lot of people are resistant to it. They want to "print the legend," as per The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.

Honestly, it's not helped by people endlessly photoshopping things without flagging them as an altered photograph or what have you.

It's a sorry state of affairs.

_________________
* * *
"The absence of limitations is the enemy of art."
― Orson Welles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group