ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Return of Dr. X (1939)
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1900 to 1949
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17019
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:00 pm    Post subject: The Return of Dr. X (1939) Reply with quote



Despite the title, this is not a sequel to "Dr. X" (1932). In this one we get to see Humphrey Bogart as a vampire!

A doctor (John Litel) uses a new procedure to revive the infamous Dr. Xavier (Bogart), executed for murdering a child. To stay alive, Dr. Xavier requires fresh blood, which he goes after with fiendish determination.

Bogart was compelled to accept the role by contract obligations. Reportedly he hated it, but it's still worth seeing for curiosity sake if nothing else. Directed by Vincent Sherman. Co-starring Rosemany Lane, Dennis Morgan, John Litel, Huntz Hall, and Wayne Morris.

The poster for this film doesn't look overly impressive until you zoom in on a hi-def version of it and notice that the portrait of Bogart is actually quite good.

The pale dots in the dark areas are actually the high spots of the canvas weave catching the light.



This shows us that the artist didn't just paint over a photo of Bogart to make it look like a work of art -- he actually painted this portrait on canvas!

By the way, this is the jpeg I started with. It needed some serious color adjustment and restoration.



_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sun Oct 16, 2022 10:38 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting to see Bogart play such a sf role. Of course he wasn't at the top of his career as of then, so they were able to force him to take on such a role.

Looking at his career he appears to be one of the few top actors of his era who never portrayed a real life person in any of his films. Gary Cooper, Jimmy Stewart, Fonda, Wayne, Flynn all played real people in some of their films.

Speaking of Flynn, one of my favs, always wondered how he might have done in the role of Dr.Jekyll & Mr.Hyde instead of Tracy in the 1941 version of that character?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17019
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobody is a bigger fan of Flynn than me, but I can't quite see Errol Flynn being able to handle a role as complex as Jekyll and Hyde. Errol played many different characters, but every performance had an underlying "Flynn-ness" that kept kept him from seeming like a drastically different person — and the Jekyll and Hyde role is the ultimate challenge in that respect.
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Nov 22, 2022 5:57 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think you are giving Flynn enough credit, Bud.

If you look at his performances in Too Much, Too Soon as John Barrymore, as well as The Sun Also Rises, I think you would see a man who could tackle complex roles.

The problems for Errol were always twofold.

Warner Brothers relegated him to action adventure roles because that's what brought in the $$$ for the studio. They rarely let him essay other parts.

I always thought he was as funny as Cary Grant & could have done many of the Grant comedic parts with ease.

The other problem was Flynn himself.

Alcoholic, drug user, burning the candle at both ends. That all severely interfered with him being taken as a serious actor & striving for stronger roles in film.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17019
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 1:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, every actor has her/her strengths and weaknesses. Flynn is a wonderful actor, but the Jekyll & Hyde role is something very few performers can do justice to. It requires the actor to completely change the way they talk, walk, stand, move, and react to their surroundings.

In the Hyde character, the actor needs to be so different from the Jekyll character that the audience is almost convinced it isn't the same man playing him anymore.

I just can't see Flynn pulling that off, despite his awesome talent.

In fact, the actors who have a very distinctive and recognizable style which underscores almost every role they play are the ones who would have the most difficulty -- actors like Tyrone Power and Burt Lancaster. They have such a well-developed personae that I don't think they could completely change it to the degree the Hyde role would require.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Nov 22, 2022 5:56 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guess we'll have to agree to disagree regarding Errol's talent, Bud. Like you I am a huge fan of him.

I would submit that if you have never seen his performance in the remarkable WW II film "Uncertain Glory,"you would be deeply impressed by his talent

He was more than a swashbuckler or western hero when he was allowed to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Phantom
Solar Explorer


Joined: 06 Sep 2015
Posts: 67

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like Flynn enormously, too. After watching him go sword to sword against the likes of Rathbone and ship to ship against a horde of pirates, it was a revelation to see him singing and dancing (very well) to "That's What You Jolly Well Get" in Thank Your Lucky Stars.

I'll have to reserve my judgement about him taking on Jekyll/Hyde, however.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe it was Errol Flynn, who said about Basil Rathbone: Poor Basil, the best swordsman in Hollywood, and he has to lose every time.

Before becoming a star, Basil Rathbone taught fencing for the studios in Hollywood.

David.
Back to top
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Basil also said that Tyrone Power could fence Errol Flynn into a corner.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17019
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read somewhere that the wonderful fencing duel between Basil and Tyrone in The Mark of Zorro was mostly performed by someone other than Tyrone!

That seems impossible. So many of the shots were close enough for you to tell it was Tyrone, but far enough back to see the dazzling fencing moves he was doing.

Where were the shots of this so-called other guy?

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Nov 22, 2022 5:54 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1877

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 5:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
Where were the shots of this so-called other guy?[/size]

You couldn't tell the difference, Bud?


_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17019
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2022 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phantom wrote:
I like Flynn enormously, too. After watching him go sword to sword against the likes of Rathbone and ship to ship against a horde of pirates, it was a revelation to see him singing and dancing (very well) to "That's What You Jolly Well Get" in Thank Your Lucky Stars.

I'll have to reserve my judgement about him taking on Jekyll/Hyde, however.

I've never seen Flynn in anything I didn't like, but I do have difficulty imagining him in a Jekyll/Hyde adaptation.

Even the finest actors have roles they are right for and roles they aren't. Flynn is so likable that I think he'd be miscast as the hideous Mr. Hyde. It would be a bit like casting the awesome Charles Laughton as a dashing, handsome pirate!

Or Maureen O'Hara as the Wicked Witch of the West!
Shocked
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmlindsey
Mission Specialist


Joined: 18 Jul 2022
Posts: 409
Location: NW Florida

PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2022 9:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just watched this last night....what an odd film.

The idea was interesting but the reporter was a little too goofy (or something) for me to take seriously. Also, I must have missed what Bogart was doing with all of the blood he drained; transfusions? Drinking?

_________________
"Have you never wondered what it would be like to walk between the ticks and tocks of Time?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17019
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2022 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tmlindsey wrote:
I must have missed what Bogart was doing with all of the blood he drained; transfusions? Drinking?

He gave himself transfusions because the newly invented synthetic blood that John Litel used to revive dead people (like Bogart) somehow broke down in their bodies and had be replaced with the real stuff.

Since real blood has to be replaced in all living people, and the revived folks couldn't replicate either the synthetic or real blood, Bogart had steal it from living folks.

But I suspect he did have a craving for Bloody Mary's from time to time. Very Happy

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tmlindsey
Mission Specialist


Joined: 18 Jul 2022
Posts: 409
Location: NW Florida

PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2022 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
He gave himself transfusions because the newly invented synthetic blood that John Litel used to revive dead people (like Bogart) somehow broke down in their bodies and had be replaced with the real stuff.


I got that part, and I assumed he did transfusions, but I didn't remember seeing anything explicit about it. Probably would have been more effective/horrifying if the Bogie man was shown kidnapping the people and setting up a drain-o-matic machine on-camera (you know, with shadows and silhouettes and all).

Time for a gritty re-boot!
Wink
_________________
"Have you never wondered what it would be like to walk between the ticks and tocks of Time?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1900 to 1949 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group