ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972)
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies from 1970 to 2000
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 7:44 pm    Post subject: Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972) Reply with quote



In the fourth film of the series, Roddy McDowall stays with the story even though his character is dead. He switches from playing Cornelius (the ape who befriends Charlton Heston in the first film) to Caesar, Cornelius' son, now living in the pre-holocaust, pre-ape-dominated society of a near-future age.

Caesar goes from circus performer to slave laborer to rebel leader. He and his fellow intelligent apes defeat the slave-master humans at a government installation and establish the first stronghold in the new ape-ruled world order. Ricardo Montalban is the circus owner, Don Murray is Caesar's slave master. Directed by Lee Thompson.

The ape series is laudable for making good use of the time paradox. Take a look at the total time line of the series.

The intelligent apes of the original film become the dominant species on the planet because of a revolt lead by Caesar, the son of the two "future apes" from the first film, Cornelius and Zira -- and then Caesar goes on to become an ancestor of the later generation who spawned his own parents!

"Conquest" also refutes the original film's sly suggestion that apes evolved intelligence after mankind destroyed itself. Contraire' -- first the apes became intelligent, then they overthrew mankind and took possession of the planet.

Strictly speaking, "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes" should be titled "Conquest of the Planet of the Humans", since the planet starts out belonging to humans and then gets conquered by apes. It's a nit-picking point perhaps, but we Ape fans enjoy such legalistic debates.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:54 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

I'm not really a fan of any of the sequels to Planet of the Apes — and I can't figure out why that's true, because this one is the biggest, the newest, the most exciting of all the Planet of the Apes pictures!

I know that must be the true, because the narrator on the trailer below says so. He also says —

This is the climax of the spectacular revolt of the apes . . . the most awesome, the most horrifying spectacle in the annals of science fiction!

Boy, I just didn't appreciate this movie. I couldn't get enthusiastic about a bunch of revolting apes. Know what I mean?

Oh, well. Confused



__________________
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sun Mar 04, 2018 4:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scotpens
Starship Captain


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 871
Location: The Left Coast

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
Boy, I just didn't appreciate this movie. I couldn't get enthusiastic about a bunch of revolting apes.

Actually they don't smell so bad once you get used to them. Laughing

The studio softened the ending, which was originally much more violent. Roddy McDowall recorded some additional dialogue ("We, who are not human, can afford to be humane") but no new footage was shot. Notice that when we hear Caesar's new lines, the movie cuts to reaction shots of the ape crowd or a close-up of Caesar's eyes.

Most of the exterior scenes were filmed in Los Angeles' Century City complex, with some location shooting done on the UC Irvine campus.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1877

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 2:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

scotpens wrote:
Most of the exterior scenes were filmed in Los Angeles' Century City complex...

They didn't realize Fox had sold the backlot to a developer.
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lot of reuse in that movie. The VTTBOTS jumpsuits, Project Tic-Toc patches on the uniforms, "City Beneath The Sea" sets. Along with "In Like Flint", COTPOTA is a good example of how studios reuse what they have on hand.

David.
Back to top
ralfy
Mission Specialist


Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Posts: 488

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The major story arc is remarkable because it makes the whole of human progress unfamiliar. In this case, apes treat humans as animals, their divine creators take on ape-like forms, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scotpens
Starship Captain


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 871
Location: The Left Coast

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the final installment of the series, Battle for the Planet of the Apes, John Huston played the ape Lawgiver. I always thought he looked like an orangutan even without the ape makeup.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert (Butch) Day
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1437
Location: Arlington, WA USA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

orzel-w wrote:
scotpens wrote:
Most of the exterior scenes were filmed in Los Angeles' Century City complex...

They didn't realize Fox had sold the backlot to a developer.


Cleopatra (1963) nearly broke the studio's back. Fox had to sell-off not only the North Hollywood lot, but props, costumes, etc. They even eventually had to sell the Fox - Malibu ranch where the Ape City set was.

The studio didn't recover until Star Wars (1977) and a name change from 20th Century-Fox to 20th Century Fox (without the hyphen).

_________________
Common Sense ISN'T Common


Last edited by Robert (Butch) Day on Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1877

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Robert (Butch) Day wrote:
The studio didn't recover until Star Wars (1977) and a name change from 20th Century-Fox to 20th Century Fox (without the hyphen).

It was probably dropping the hyphen that really paid off for them. Wink
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert (Butch) Day
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1437
Location: Arlington, WA USA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

orzel-w wrote:
It was probably dropping the hyphen that really paid off for them. Wink

True. Under the weird laws governing studios in Karloffornia, by changing the name — even the minor change of the hyphen — absolved Fox from certain past debts. (Including some paycheck obligations to the actors!)
_________________
Common Sense ISN'T Common
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17016
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2016 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

Wow, that's fascinating. Does that mean Ann-Margret can just change her name to Ann Margret and scoff in the face of her creditors if she ever gets deeply in debt? Very Happy

_____

Butch, I was sure you were pulling our leg with that hyphen stuff until I found this eBay auction for the original hyphen that Fox sold off! It's even been authenticated by somebody we know! Shocked



_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3400
Location: New York

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2016 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had read an article that stated the 1965 movie musical "The Sound of Music" saved 20th Century Fox from going under due to the "Cleopatra" debacle.

Around the studio back then folks referred to "TSOM" as "The sound of money."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert (Butch) Day
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1437
Location: Arlington, WA USA

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2016 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Sound Of Music only partly relieved the studio of Cleopatra's massive debt. (I was one of those who lost in the paycheck mess-up.)

It began to recover when they sold the North Hollywood facilities (some 50 shops and 2 back-lots) which became Century City, part of which was the area where they filmed portions of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972).

The studio finally recovered with the release of Star Wars (1977) and it's two sequels. They then re-incorporated in 1985. The hyphen was used from it's founding until re-incorporation.

The hyphen is indicative of the studio's origins, 20th Century Pictures (founded by Joseph Schenck and Darryl F. Zanuck) and Fox Films (founded by William Fox), Hence 20th Century-Fox.

_________________
Common Sense ISN'T Common
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
scotpens
Starship Captain


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 871
Location: The Left Coast

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2016 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pow wrote:
I had read an article that stated the 1965 movie musical "The Sound of Music" saved 20th Century Fox from going under due to the "Cleopatra" debacle.

Around the studio back then folks referred to "TSOM" as "The sound of money."

So did Mad magazine.

Link: http://media.dcentertainment.com/sites/default/files/imce/The-Sound-of-Money_529f9fda641485.00006281.jpg


Robert (Butch) Day wrote:
The Sound Of Music only partly relieved the studio if Cleopatra's massive debt. (I was one of those who lost in the paycheck mess-up.)

It began to recover when they sold the North Hollywood facilities (some 50 shops and 2 back-lots) which became Century City, part of which was the area where they filmed portions of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972).

Minor geographical correction: The former backlot where Century City now stands is in West Los Angeles, not North Hollywood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bogmeister
Galactic Fleet Vice Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 574

PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

____________
_________

There are a few sci-fi fans who consider this 4th film (the 3rd sequel) in the Apes saga to be atrocious and perhaps even the worst of the lot. And yet, there are also a few who consider this one to be the best sequel. In many ways, this one is the most divisive of the 4 sequels. Hard to pin down? Difficult to analyze properly? You say monkey business, I say ape action?

________ Conquest Of The Planet Of The Apes


__________


I believe that this 4th film in the Apes series (after Escape From the Planet of the Apes) has some fans because it's the most ambitious of the sequels. To wit: during the course of the film, we are presented with an alternate version of modern North America (circa 1991), a totalitarian version, and then the planning and execution to overthrow this regime — a full-fledged revolution.

Of course, events such as these should take years, sometimes many years, and everything is compressed into what seems to be a matter of weeks. We may infer that the story is a parable, perhaps not to be taken completely literally.




Taking place almost 20 years after the events of the previous film, we learn quite a bit in the first few scenes, courtesy of Ricardo Montalban's character, Armando, who explains all this stuff to the son (Roddy McDowall) of the 2 apes from the far future.

Quite a lot has happened in those past couple of decades, including the death of all cats & dogs due to a plague (back in 1983). Apes have already evolved within this very short time into mankind's latest slave class (perhaps the plague affected them — this is conjecture; the filmmakers don't bother to explain why the apes here already look like the futuristic ones of 2,000 years later — in Planet of the Apes, 1968).

Also, with this oppressive, cruel atmosphere, it's no accident that some of the policemen resemble Nazi storm troopers. I think the film was pretty successful in presenting this oppression. I felt a bit closed in and trapped when I first watched this, as if I was about to be arrested any second.




This film tries to make a statement, which can be powerful if presented correctly and all too rare in most science fiction films (especially nowadays). As to how well the film succeeds at this . . . well, that's what promotes debate.

What it proposes is that mankind will always fill the need to possess a slave class. Is it (a) out of plain laziness? (b) The advances in a society in which most free citizens outgrow all menial jobs? Or is it (c) just some need to dominate another class?

What might annoy some viewers is the presumably easy way in which America slipped towards a version of Nazi Germany. This is done to facilitate the story of a rebellion, but no substantial reasons are given for this slip to the dark side. As said, there's room for debate — this film proposes that societies seem doomed to a cycle, as the new lower class eventually rises up and forms the new society. In this case, all that was needed was a new Caesar (McDowall) to organize the worker class. I did like a few of the scenes here, especially where the future ape leader picks out his new name and all his scenes with the fascistic governor (Murray).




The scenes of those multitudes of apes, dressed in basic colors, undergoing mass training, stay in the mind because they really are disturbing. The cinematography is different from the previous films, stressing deep blacks and a coarse palette. Filmed in an area with very modern architecture (even by today's standards), this achieves a nice futuristic feel. Much of the later scenes take place at night, in the dark, including all the climactic battle action sequences during the swift revolution, and this future city forms an eerie backdrop.

I don't pretend to understand how even taking over this one entire city results in eventual global control by the apes, but speaking of battle, the next and final film was Battle For the Planet of the Apes. Maybe that one would explain some of these issues, but I think you would have to approach it with an open mind — a very open mind.


BoG's Score: 7 out of 10



BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies from 1970 to 2000 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group