ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Thing from Another World (1951)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
johnnybear
Mission Specialist


Joined: 15 Jun 2016
Posts: 441

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2019 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pow wrote:
BTW, the episode featuring some excellent scenes of the demolished M-G-M back lot is "The Legacy" from October 11, 1974.

The episode "The Trap'' may have also been shot on the M-G-M back lot as it was being torn down. However, I am not 100% certain about that one.

I'm pretty sure both episodes were filmed back to back but The Trap was screened first! And if they had limited time in which to film there might explain why both shows were done together!
JB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnnybear
Mission Specialist


Joined: 15 Jun 2016
Posts: 441

PostPosted: Sat Nov 09, 2019 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excellent piece of work! Sakourra looks very much like Torin Thatcher as do the monsters and the skeleton resemble their own originals!
JB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alltare
Quantum Engineer


Joined: 17 Jul 2015
Posts: 351

PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eadie wrote:
I wonder if ANYONE (member or not) has a copy [of the colorized version]?

Yes, I found a version on Pirate Bay that shows more detail (less fuzzy) than your pics, Eadie. It's 480p, which is as good as you'll get from a VHS tape. And as you said, the colorization was done pretty well, considering when it was done. All in all, a fun alternative to the BW version.

About that machine in the aerial view of the saucer site: It could be a Zamboni. To maintain the reflective surface of the ice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17083
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pow wrote:
If you look at an excellent print of the scene of the battle between Sinbad & the skeleton in 1958's "The 7th Voyage Of Sinbad" it is an amazing blend of live action & stop~motion animation.

Sir, I must respectfully (and strongly) disagree with your assertion that the skeleton fight in Sinbad (or any another Harryhausen scene) could be described as "an amazing blend of live action & stop~motion animation."

Naturally, seeing the two elements together is wonderful. But those two never really "blend". They co-exist in beautiful contrast . . . Cool


___________Sinbad VS Evil Magician's Skeleton


__________


Those of us who love animation take great delight in watching what is quite obviously a stop-motion model on a table, with a rear projection screen behind it showing us an actor pretending to fight with the skeleton.

Knowing how it's done and what awesome skills are required to do it are what makes it so amazing! The very fact that it's not realistic is why this is art. Harryhausen himself has stated in interviews that his animation is not supposed to look realistic.

It's supposed to be a "fantasy on film".

Please forgive me, guys, but the point I keep harping on is that in a story like Who Goes There?, the audience needs to believe that the hideous, shape-shifting alien is right there in the room with the terrified humans . . . not perched on an animation table in front of a rear projection screen while the actors cringe convincingly.

That's what made Carpenter's The Thing so shocking. Everything we saw was right there with the actors — pulsing with life, glistening with goo, dripping all over the place! Shocked

In other words, the creatures were doing all the things that stop motion cannot do . . . by it's very nature. Sad

Gentlemen, I haven't forgotten that we're talking about film-making in the early 1950s, so what I'm suggesting is the use of elaborate creature FX like those done in Them! — but much better. A creepy alien being, manipulated by operators who bring it to life in brief scenes which tease the audience and convince them that this unholy creature is very close to the terrified people . . . oozing with goo, throbbing with life, pulsing with evil! Shocked

I hate to say it, but this is not a story which needs stunning stop-motion by Harryhausen, using beautifully designed creatures similar to this one.






It needs something tangible and repulsive and shockingly real . . . like this one!





And the creature needs to be right there on the set, fighting with the characters, frightening the audience, threatening the people in the movie we've come to care about! Shocked

Gentlemen, please understand that I respect your opinions. Nobody on Earth loves stop motion more than yours truly — which is why I spent many hours in my youth creating short 8mm movies with little clay models.



_ __


Howard Hawks knew that the alien had to be right there with the actors — not separated by FX techniques and obvious edits which shattered the audience's suspicion of disbelief.

After all, a technique like stop motion is supposed to yank the audience out of reality and plunge them into fantasy! Harryhausen told us this himself.

But a movie based on Who Goes There? is supposed to envelope the audience in a non-stop nightmare which pulls them deeper and deeper into a horrible experience . . . one from which there is no escape! Shocked

And that, guys, is the whole problem with using stop motion in a movie like this. Harryhausen's animation is intended to be an escape from reality, a doorway into an enjoyable fantasy world. It is NOT supposed to convince us that what we're seeing is real!

In fact, it's exactly the reverse . . . it's supposed to present us with images which are miraculously unreal!
Cool
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Fri Apr 15, 2022 2:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17083
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

Thinking Outside the "Plot"!
________________________________

~ A Question for the Members: With the whole world now alerted to the fact that a hideous and hostile alien race sent an invader to turn mankind into it's own food supply, would America and her allies band together to develop a fleet of spacecraft to launch a counter attack?

~ My Theory: We damn well better! The lone invader almost established beachhead on Earth, despite the fact that it's a "vegetable creature" struggling to survive at the North Pole while using sled dogs and human beings to nurture a growing crop of lethal offspring!

If one creature at the North Pole could do that, imagine what a hundred of them could do if they landed in Oklahoma and slaughter all the citizens of a small town! Shocked



]


(I just tossed this out to encourage a discussion. I hope I get one.) Confused
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Oct 19, 2022 5:17 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3423
Location: New York

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe we would see a world united to battle such an alien threat, Bud.

Mind you, it would parallel WWII in that such a coalition would have serious internal strife due to political issues, varying ideas as how to wage battles, cultural differences, ego, and just the general contrary nature of humans.

However, like WWII we'd somehow through miracles, grit and understanding manage to pull it off.

The sad reality though is that as soon the alien invasion was quelled our individual nations would go right back to their power politics and petty squabbles.

Reminds me of the excellent Outer Limits episode "The Architects Of Fear" from September 30, 1963.

Synopsis } A group of scientists hope to unite a divided world by presenting a common enemy that will result in the nations of the Earth uniting.

One of the scientists will undergo radical surgery based upon an alien from the planet Theta. Once that is completed the "Thetan" will arrive on our planet posing as the first invader of a race coming to conquer Earth.

This, so the scientists believe, will unite our planet and its nations once and for all.

The ending narration beautifully sums it up : "Scarecrows and magic and other fatal fears do not bring people closer together. There is no magic substitute for soft caring and hard work, for self~respect and mutual love. If we can learn this from the mistake these frightened men made, then their mistake will not have been merely grotesque. It will have been at least a lesson---a lesson at last to be learned."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17083
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

I'm not a big fan of the original Outer Limits series, but that particular episode is still powerful, and that closing narration is worthy of the story.

Great post, Pow.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17083
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Jan 27, 2021 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

At last!


It's finally here!!

The Blu-ray of . . .

The Thing from Another World!!!

Okay, so it came out three years ago and I just found out about it. Where's Brent Gair when you need him? Rolling Eyes

__________ <— link

The price is $13.45, and it arrives the day after the order is placed. Mine will be here tomorrow!! Cool
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gord Green
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 2944
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote






_________________
There comes a time, thief, when gold loses its lustre, and the gems cease to sparkle, and the throne room becomes a prison; and all that is left is a father's love for his child.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3423
Location: New York

PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2021 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's see what Bill Warren's book Keep Watching the Skies! (one of the final lines in The Thing From Another World) has to say?

The Thing is widely regarded as one of the best science fiction films and, with The Day the Earth Stood Still, is the most serious attempt in the 1950s by a major filmmaker to work with science-fictional ideas.

The script for The Thing was written by Charles Lederer, although producer Howard Hawks undoubtedly had a hand in its construction.
Hawks & Lederer jettisoned much of the detail of John W. Campell's scary novella. Instead of a shape-changing monster, they created a Frankenstein-shaped vegetable creature that drinks blood. This far more a creation of elementary horror fantasy than science fiction, but for audiences in 1951, it probably made the film more credible. And credibility was what Hawks was striving for.

The characters in The Thing are more varied than in most science fiction movies and they are also amusing and at least somewhat colorful.

It's the situation and the story that make The Thing From Another World so compelling, so much fun.

The Thing hasn't dated except in details; the swift, involving style of Howard Hawks makes the picture almost as powerful today, in fact, even after such gut-wrenchers as The Exorcist (1973), that The Thing must have been almost overwhelming in 1951.

Science fiction and horror are basically melodramas, tales of situations, not stories about people. What we need in most SF and horror movies are basically serviceable, acceptable characters, not solidly realistic human beings. Stories about people are best told in familiar surroundings, with uncomplicated plots, so we can concentrate on the characters.

The story of The Thing is a strong, straight-line narrative.

The dialogue is excellent, and Hawks uses his frequent overlapping technique to increase not only a sense of verisimilitude but one of headlong movement through the story. The dialogue doesn't particularly characterize the performers; Kenneth Tobey speaks much like Dewey Martin.

One of the most effective sequences in the picture has almost no dialogue at all. When the ship is frozen in the ice, Hendry orders the men to spread out, each standing over an edge of the ship as seen through the ice, to get an idea of its general outline. As the music builds, the men slowly form a circle, and stand for a moment in stunned silence as the music (by Dimitri Tiomkin) abruptly ceases.

The sequence of wild surmise, as they all stare at each other for a moment and realize they have found a flying saucer (though they try to avoid that term), is one of the best scene in any science fiction films.

Some commentators have felt that The Thing is anti-intellectual and pro-military. In the original script, Carrington is killed and Scotty says, "Both monsters are dead."
Carrington is allowed to live in the final print, in an effort to make him seem misguided rather than evil.

However, the military doesn't come off any better.

As John Brosnan says in Future Tense, "Hendry....only succeeds when he abandons the Army rule book and uses his own common sense and that of his men....Some of the scientists are made to look foolish because they too are bound by a scientific rule book of their own; as The Thing is intelligent, they believe there has to be some common ground between it and them, but there isn't."

If the film is anything, it's anti-dogma. The other scientists in the film are reasonable and intelligent; Carrington himself, in fact, is not even supposed to be wrong in principle, just in this particular instance.

Also contrary to hero type, Hendry makes several mistakes.
Unfortunately, Margaret Sheridan's Nikki is not central to the story. She's a strong personality but not strongly used, and Sheridan's intelligent performance is somewhat lost in the shuffle.

Douglas Spencer as Scotty has some of the best lines in the film, but his performance is somewhat a throwaway. It's not the actors who make The Thing so entertaining anyway.

Dimitri Tiomkin's score, is mostly effective although overly dramatic at times.

The vividness and excitement of The Thing from Another World have made it a classic. Whatever the quality of the remake, the old version will remain a high point in science fiction movies.

Sidebar: I should note that when Gene was writing this book, it was announced that John Carpenter was going to helm a new version. Hence his mentioning the remake which had not been produced when Gene was putting together his book.

I like a lot of what Warren says. I disagree when he writes that it's not the performers who make the movie entertaining. Oddly, he praises the fact that they are "varied," "amusing," and "somewhat colorful." Captain Hendry "makes mistakes," Carrington is not entirely wrong, are also observations by Warren.
Doesn't that translate into the fact that we are seeing characters with dimension and humor as opposed to just a bunch of stiffs? I know I found 'em more intriguing than the usual cardboard characters we usually see in these 1950s SF movies.

You can find one-dimensional characters in Ray Harryhausen's 1950s movies as an example. And I say that as a huge fan of the incredible man's stop-motion work. Do you really recall anything special about the casts from 20,000,000 Miles to Earth, Earth Versus the Flying Saucers, or It Came From Beneath the Sea? I don't. They were all competent actors with zero personality or any real distinctiveness to them. They drove the plot of those films and that was it.

The cast from The Thing are more memorable for me because the writer & director invested them with some interesting dialogue and moments between them. They seemed realer to me and I liked them better for it. You could even see Carrington's points as he foolishly attempts to protect the alien. That kind of complexity was missing from the bulk of these 1950s movies.

I think that the producers of those SF movies felt that it was all about the alien, mutant, dinosaur, whatever and the visual effects. The actors were there to give exposition in order to move along the story, so they didn't really require fleshing out the characters.

I think that Hawks and Lederer just might have thought why do they have to follow a tired, old prescribed formula? Where's it written in a rule book that you can't entertain the audience with both the creature and with some cool human characters? Let's break the mold.
I'm glad that they did.

I also did not find Tiomkin's score overly dramatic. It grabs you right from the opening credits and is used effectively throughout the movie. It never gets in the way, nor does it slide into becoming musical wallpaper that you hardly notice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pow
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 27 Sep 2014
Posts: 3423
Location: New York

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You gents are correct, the scene where Tex is first seen talking to Captain Hendry in flight appears to be a control tower and that's where we see windows behind Tex.

The Radio Room we later see Tex in has no windows and that's when he mentions he will be safe from the Thing getting in to him.

Do those stairs in the background of the Radio Room (I think they were spiral) lead up to the control tower room? If so, why doesn't Tex, or anyone else, suggest that the alien just might crawl up the tower and smash in those windows and then climb down the stairs and kill Tex?

Also, why couldn't the alien simply smash in the door of the Radio Room if he wanted? Was it a metal door? Even so they cannot be sure as to the exact strength of this creature.
And why did Tex say he'd be safe in the Radio Room when earlier there was a scene where they told him to lock himself in and guns don't kill the intruder. Tex sure seemed frightened over all of that, odd that later on he's fine staying in the Radio Room all alone.

I believe it is Nikki who is the only one to refer to the alien as "that thing." The rest of the people refer to him as "our friend," and "our visitor." Never as the Thing.

Tropical Tilly is the name of Captain Hendry's plane.

The scene where the flying saucer explodes under the ice has a funny blooper. Watch as Hendry, Carrington, Scotty and all the men duck for cover when the second explosion takes place.
The men all hurl themselves to the ground but the sled dogs behind them are all standing up as calmly as can be with no reaction to the explosions.

At the end of the movie we see many people gather into the Radio Room and they are now in contact with the military base in Anchorage. Scotty asks if there are any newsmen there and is told the room is full of 'em. He asks Captain Hendry if he can report the story of what happened at the scientific outpost with he alien. Hendry gives him the go ahead. And Scotty gives the iconic line in his report "Keep watching the skies!"

Whoa Nellie! General Foggerty, Hendry's superior, hasn't given permission for Scotty to divulge what has happened regarding the Thing. We don't see Hendry ask Foggerty. We don't know if Foggerty has even received any orders from the Pentagon at this point on the matter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gord Green
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 2944
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The scene where the flying saucer explodes under the ice has a funny blooper. Watch as Hendry, Carrington, Scotty and all the men duck for cover when the second explosion takes place.

The men all hurl themselves to the ground but the sled dogs behind them are all standing up as calmly as can be with no reaction to the explosions.

Nobody told the dogs!
_________________
There comes a time, thief, when gold loses its lustre, and the gems cease to sparkle, and the throne room becomes a prison; and all that is left is a father's love for his child.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17083
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

Okay, okay, I can fix this. Lemme think . . . ummm . . . what are the reasons a group of sled dogs would NOT shit right there in the snow when a colossal bomb blast went off?

All right . . . try these possibilities.

~ All the dogs were frozen with fear! After all, they're arctic sled dogs. They're half frozen all the time!

~ All the dogs were deaf. The constant barking they do while "mushing" across the tundra left them hard of hearing. Sad

~ All the dogs were too dumb than the people. They didn't realize that a giant explosion was something that might be harmful. After all, how smart would these dogs have be when they only need to obey two command: "Mush!" and "Whoooa!" Rolling Eyes

~ All the dogs were smarter than the people! They knew damn well it was stupid to use thermite to melt the ice around a crashed aircraft which would be immersed in all the flammable fuel that spilled out of the wreck! Shocked

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Space Ranger


Joined: 19 Feb 2023
Posts: 190

PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The movie makes it clear that Doctor Carrington was impaired, and not thinking clearly due to fatigue and lack of sleep. He was too tired to see the situation clearly.

Captain Hendry wasn't winging it alone, the other Scientist stated that sought out their advice, knowledge and help.

When the book doesn't cover the situation, then you toss the book, improvise and pray you make the correct decisions.

Even as a Kid, I thought they should have kept some of the Alien Buds, and seeds for study. Know thy enemy.

The question is, did the Aliens know about Earth's climate, or was it just a shot in the dark? Was it a one Carrot colonizing mission, or the first of a wave? Or even not the first, but they just haven't found out about the others? It was only by chance that they discovered this one.

David.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17083
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 10:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Krel wrote:
Even as a kid, I thought they should have kept some of the alien buds, and seeds for study. Know thy enemy.

The question is, did the Aliens know about Earth's climate, or was it just a shot in the dark? Was it a one Carrot colonizing mission, or the first of a wave? Or even not the first, but they just haven't found out about the others? It was only by chance that they discovered this one.

Those are great observations! Bravo, David! Very Happy

Imagine a sequel in which a government laboratory grows aliens from the seed pods that were somehow not destroyed. The beings are created for the specific purpose of learning all about these dangerous aliens before another ship lands on Earth.

Remember, the "unborn" aliens that Carrington cultivated were said to be growing unusually fast, so we can assume the ones in the laboratory would do the same. Presumably these aliens would be totally ignorant about their species' culture or technology.






However, perhaps these "young" aliens would have instincts which governed their behavior and made them hostile towards lifeforms other than their own. This would thwart the efforts of the scientists to persuade these creatures to be cooperative with the humans.

As for their language, perhaps it's instinct as well, rather than "learned", the way our languages are. That would mean the aliens could communicate with each other as soon as they were mature enough — but they would have neither the interest nor the ability to learn our languages.

This suggests an obvious plot element; a group of aliens secretly conspire to escape captivity . . . without us ever knowing they were doing so!

What a sequel this would make! An "invasion" by aliens who were deliberately raised from infancy so we could learn more about an enemy who might attack us from space!

If you have any thoughts on this idea, considered adding them to the thread below. Cool

The Thing from Another World ~ A very different sequel!

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 10 of 11

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group