ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FEATURED THREADS for 4-29-23

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> What's New at All Sci-Fi
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17115
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2023 10:45 pm    Post subject: FEATURED THREADS for 4-29-23 Reply with quote



If you're not a member of All Sci-Fi, registration is easy. Just use the registration password, which is —

gort



Attention members! If you've forgotten your password, just email me at Brucecook1@yahoo.com.
____________________________________________________________________

Absolutely everything you every wanted to know about Damnation Alley, Star Wars, and Alien — compliments of the late Mr. Bogmeister and his dedication to creating super-duper reviews with a ton of information and a boatload of images! Cool

____________________________________________________________________

Damnation Alley (1977)

____________
_______________

_________________ Damnation Alley TV Spot


__________


_________

A bigger-budgeted post-holocaust sci-fi picture than the usual seventies efforts, this begins at a desolate air force base and turns into a road movie — a Road Warrior-type road movie.

This film was delayed for a few months due to FX fix-ups (which didn't help it). Then Star Wars came out and the studio executives hoped this would make at least as much money as that Lucas-directed fiasco . . . ah, it didn't.

The studio re-edited the film before release, cutting out scenes and upsetting star Peppard; it failed. Strangely, there wasn't an official DVD release of this until 2011. Oh, and, Roger Zelazny, I hear, hated this film version of his novel.

I'm not surprised to hear that.




ABOVE: Jackie Earle Haley, Dominique Sanda, Jan-Michael

Vincent & George Peppard in front of the Landmaster. Yes, that's the same Haley who would play Rorschach in Watchmen so many years later in 2009.

I also read the book by Zelazny. I think I read it just before seeing the movie back in '77. Zelazny's tale is different from the movie version in terms of the characters. In the book, the main character of Hell Tanner is a Hell's Angel-type of biker outlaw who is forced into the position of being some kind of hero. As for his name, the story goes that when he was born, his father was asked what to name him and the daddy kind of just growled "hell" in disgust as he stalked out.



In the movie, I don't think Tanner has a first name and he's a straight-arrow type, a member of the Air Force. As played by Jan-Michael Vincent, he's the younger, less-disciplined officer to George Peppard's older, more gruff one.

Paul Winfield is a 3rd officer who turns after everything blows up. They set out in a special vehicle from their wrecked base to see what's what in the desolation of the new America. They stop off in Vegas, finding Dominique Sanda all alone in what's left of the gambling capital, and later come across Jackie Earle Haley, a kid who likes to throw rocks.

The special Landmaster vehicle has an earlier, smaller version in the children's sf TV series Ark II, which aired a year before this film.

I liked the film overall when I watched it as a teen. It was a pretty exciting adventure and I thought the giant scorpions were cool (a brief scene, however, and it does not hold up well these days).

I liked the whole post-apocalyptic setting: the 12-wheeled Landmaster super-vehicle (the best character, unfortunately), the irradiated hillbilly villains, some of the FX towards the end, and especially the mutated cockroaches in the most intense sequence in the middle of the film.

_____
______________

This is the one scene that still creeps me out a bit, even as I know that the 'carpet-swarm' of the deadly critters is less-than-fully-realistic nowadays. But, the whole concept of now-empty cities infested with such nasty vermin sends a little chill down me spine. This concept is not done too much in post-nuclear war film settings, even though everyone believes (or believed) that bugs such as this would be the only ones to possibly thrive in such an aftermath.


__________ Damnation Alley Giant Cockroaches


__________


I'm not as impressed with the film nowadays — I last checked it out a couple of years ago. It's a bit too by-the-numbers and the characters are a bit bland. The beginning is ok, but the ending is very uneventful and dull, with a strange turn-for-the-better slant to it that doesn't make all that much sense — it's as if someone decided this needed a positive ending, against all logic.

Trivia From the Alley: uncredited small role for Murray Hamilton as the general in the early scenes. Though most of the killer cockroach scenes were done with fakes on carpets, there were 300 actual Madagascar Cockroaches imported for the scenes, as well. As required, these were shipped back when their scenes were done. However, about 5 years later a few of these were spotted in the rafters where filming took place.

BoG's Score: 6.5 out of 10




BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
____________________________________________________________________

Star Wars Episode IV - A New Hope (1977)

____________
____________

A Long Time Ago, in a Galaxy Far, Far Away . . .

After the opening scrawl which explains a few details of where the film will place us, the opening shot places the audience on notice — this was the new realm of cinema science fiction, a vast expanse filled which vast ships which filled the screen with spectacle never before seen in this genre of film.

Though now known as "Episode IV - A New Hope," this will always be for many fans, namely those who first saw this exhilarating entertainment in theaters back in '77, the first "Star Wars." Such viewers of the original version in 1977 will always think of it as just "Star Wars" — plain & simple, no pretensions, no aspirations to deep film-making or high art, no thought to the later sequels or prequels which changed the way we looked upon this first film in an enormous saga (only now gaining new films to the saga, yet again — chapter 7 is due in 2015).

This is where we first met them all: Luke, Han Solo, Princess Leia, Obi-Wan Kenobi (old 'Ben'), the tall hairy Chewbacca, the 2 robots C3PO & R2D2 and, of course, Darth Vader. They were instant pop culture icons; you got the sense you'd seen them before somewhere, but were sure this wasn't possible. But they'd been there before in our minds.

___
_______________

We'd read about them constantly in science fiction novels and short stories — tales of outer space civilizations, of spaceships zooming through asteroid belts, of exotic-looking aliens hanging around space ports. We'd dream about them at night and try to imagine ourselves in their midst; up until then, we could only imagine such things — there were no projected images to realize such dreams.

Oh, there were the classic comic books, like Weird Science-Fantasy from EC, and in film, Forbidden Planet from 1956 came close, and then there were the Star Trek and Lost in Space shows on TV, both hampered by dime store budgets and cheesy sets (Star Trek was better, of course). We ate 'em up since there was nothing else.

Then Lucas made it real.

____________
____________
____

I remember when I first got wind of the upcoming movie, to open in May of 1977, I think. I saw the first publicized poster and bought the novel adaptation. On the poster, a young man stood with some light sword raised, a princess at his feet, numerous spaceships flying all over the place.

I was in my mid-teens and felt the first pulse of building excitement as I realized all those fantastic tales I'd been reading the past few years were going to come alive on the big screen for me.

It didn't disappoint.

Luke Skywalker, who stood in for all the boys pretending to be on a galactic adventure, gets swept away from his mundane desert home smack dab into the middle of an honest-to-gosh galaxy-wide civil war!

The strength of the narrative was amazing. There are no slow spots and you can't wait for the next scene during the entire experience.

And "experience" is the better description for it, rather than just 'movie.' You can't wait, for example, for the moment when Luke actually meets the princess. (What will happen then? Shocked) It's a textbook case of an exciting narrative and what I believe makes this superior to all the sequels (knowing that many feel The Empire Strikes Back Episode V is superior — I must disagree).

___
______________
_____
____________


The one character you really can't wait to see again is the ominous Vader, naturally. The instant he steps into view during the first few minutes of the story, you just know this is the ultimate villain.

This is the baddest of the bad, the coolest of the cool, the supreme uber-evildoer of the entire galaxy. You just know it by his stance, by his attitude, and by the electric chill that runs through your frail form as he steps down the corridor, moving into the annals of film history with one fell swoop.

You can't wait to see what he does next, what nefarious action will send someone or some planet to its doom. Sure, he seems under the control of Tarkin (Peter Cushing) here — and in later films, the Emperor — but you just know he's simply biding his time until he takes over the whole damn universe.

There is no precedent for Vader, and nothing close to him after. He's at his best here, where there's still much mystery attached to his dark frightful form, a minion of Satan and Nazi stormtroopers all rolled into one.

___________
___________

This was also the movie-experience which catapulted Harrison Ford (Han Solo) into superstardom. He seems almost childish here, not really straining to create a character, and it's this flip charm that makes it work, against all odds. He really does appear to have stepped out of the pages of some juvenile space opera, laser guns blazing, all snide remarks and foolhardy bravado.

But he also becomes the older brother figure to Luke, who cannot carry the story by himself. They were all iconic characters, as mentioned, but Ford also brought an abundance of personality and flamboyance to his role — his is the most entertaining character as we wait to see what trouble or what more attitude he will bring to the table.

He also brings some humor to his scenes and this, along with a few other choice scenes — mostly with the amusing robots — sets this initial entry in the saga apart from the other Star Wars films; the remaining films were more grim and what humor they had did not work well. Ford had been trying to make a career of it for a decade already by this point, so he was not a newbie at this.

_____
_____

Mark Hamill, whose movie career began & all but ended with Luke, epitomizes the center of destiny for a galaxy. Both humble and arrogant, he's perfect in the role — at once a cocky kid and someone wise beyond his years, who knows that he's involved in some very important stuff.

Carrie Fisher's main surprise as Leia is that she's not all sugar and sweet as one would expect of a princess. As an actress, she was young and inexperienced here, trying a faux Brit accent in her early scenes, but her caustic remarks later in the story, now directed at the heroes, sprinkled some diverting seasoning on the ensemble.

These three characters evolved in the next two films, but they were always at their best here, icons given life for a short period — but also forever in film. The same could be said for Alec Guinness as Ben Kenobi, a first class act all the way. You almost believe that this elderly warrior could topple an empire, given enough time. Unless he runs into Vader...






The plot moves the characters all over the place within the confines of this mythical galaxy and it never lags — new viewers are gifted with new astounding sights and scenarios in every reel.

It begins in an out-of-the-way place, a desert planet (Tatooine, but not named until the next film) where the news of a brewing rebellion barely registers; it's a place of simple farmers and, in what passes for towns, the dregs of society.

The audience is aware, though, that an Empire rules the galaxy — its rulers just never bother with such a useless planet — until now.

Luke soon has reason to despise the Empire and its enforcers, the armored imperial storm troopers and their leader, Vader. Old Ben Kenobi imparts some bits of history to Luke, including how the deposed Republic had been enforced by an order of Jedi Knights — all now gone — and that they used a lightsaber as their primary weapon.

Luke & Kenobi find a pilot, smuggler Han Solo, to take them off planet, and they eventually make their way to the Death Star, a moon-sized space station which is the Empire's latest weapon and which can destroy entire planets. It's there that the Princess is held.

For the final act, the rebels make an all-out attack on this Death Star, but they are outmatched and success seems to hinge on an ephemeral source of power called "The Force" — a power that Luke might be able to wield.

_______
___________

In the chronology of the eventual 6-part movie saga, this 4th episode takes place about 20 years after Episode III, Revenge of the Sith (2005), in which the Emperor took over the running of the galaxy.

As already mentioned, the next chapter, 5, was in 1980 — The Empire Strikes Back. However, this one — chapter IV — was filmed first and remains the most successful entry in the franchise, arguably the biggest box office success in film history.

Before this film, the biggest summer blockbuster was Jaws (1975); Star Wars surpassed it to take the box office crown. The only film which is said to match this one in ticket sales is Gone With the Wind (1939). Others which come close are E.T. (1982) and Titanic (1997). What is also impressive is that the special re-release of Star Wars with updated special FX in 1997 was also a big hit, far more than what is usual for re-releases. It remains a popular classic.

BoG's Score: 9 out of 10





Star Trivia of Hope: this film had an enormous influence on sci-fi cinema and forever changed the landscape of science fiction in film - big budget sci-fi was suddenly the norm after this film, not the anomaly. Close Encounters, released near the end of 1977, was already planned by Spielberg before Star Wars came out, but immediate big films that probably wouldn't have been made if not for Star Wars include Star Trek the Motion Picture, Alien and Disney's The Black Hole (all 1979).

This effect of big budget sf films continued through the eighties and into the 21st century. Dave Prowse, a tall muscular Brit actor usually in small roles (A Clockwork Orange), put on the Darth Vader costume to enact the role, but the voice was provided by James Earl Jones.

Another famous Brit actor here is Peter Cushing, famous as a Hammer Films star; many years later, the 'other' famous Hammer Films star, Christopher Lee, would appear in the prequels. This was only the 3rd pro feature film that George Lucas directed, following American Graffiti (73) — which was a big success — and THX-1138 (71), which was not. He did not direct the two Star Wars sequels in 1980 & 1983, content to just produce. He would not return to the director's chair until The Phantom Menace prequel in 1999.

BoG's Score: 9 out of 10


__________Mos Eisley - These are not the droids


__________



______ Han Solo - Bounty Hunter (Harrison Ford)


__________


The above scenes give a good idea of how the film progresses — great stuff, but the Best Scene is with Vader on the Death Star. One of the Empire's generals brags about the power of the Death Star, and Vader counters with his opinion of the power of The Force. The general derides Vader and his view, but Vader responds that he finds the general's "lack of faith disturbing" and proceeds to demonstrate a small expression of such power.

Owned! — Vader-style.

Mention should also be made of Peter Cushing as Grand Moff Tarkin, a high-ranking bureaucrat in the Empire, also commander of the Death Star and someone ruthless enough to even control Vader. Cushing was best known for his heroes in Hammer films and his cold demeanor here was very well played.


__________ "I find your lack of faith disturbing"


__________




BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
____________________________________________________________________

Alien (1979)

____________
____________

_____________________ Alien (1979) Trailer


__________



_________________

It wasn't the space horror that impressed me about Alien when in came out 30 years ago; it was all the attention to detail that was usually non-existent in these sf pictures. Director Ridley Scott, Giger and the various production design team members made sure that we felt we really were on some space freighter of the future, grungy and rundown as it was in places. I think it was a detriment to me that I watched a behind-the-scenes featurette on making this film at the same point I went to see it; unfortunately, it took away much of the mystique.

________

I also really admired the acting n this one; there was a naturalism which was missing in the usual films about the future. Sigourney Weaver is the one who benefited, becoming a big star more through her screen presence than any acting style, but Tom Skerritt, Harry Dean Stanton, Veronica Cartwright and Yaphet Kotto were excellent as the various members of this doomed crew; Ian Holm was ambiguous; and John Hurt was on screen fairly briefly, but was his usual professional self. They all drew you in to their dilemma - not by being very nice, likable characters but by reminding us of ourselves; it just may as well be us stuck on this creepy ship.

________
________

The sequel was Aliens (1986) by James Cameron, a different style but also effective. The later ones, Alien3 and Alien Resurrection, just seemed to be copying this, less successfully. And Alien vs Predator was just a kiddie show. This first one remains the adult, innovative, professional effort, even if it does copy the plot of It! The Terror From Beyond Space (1958).

BoG's Score: 8 out of 10


___
______________
_____________________



BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> What's New at All Sci-Fi All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group