ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FEATURED THREADS for 6-28-23

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> What's New at All Sci-Fi
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17111
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:44 am    Post subject: FEATURED THREADS for 6-28-23 Reply with quote



If you're not a member of All Sci-Fi, registration is easy. Just use the registration password, which is —

gort



Attention members! If you've forgotten your password, just email me at Brucecook1@yahoo.com.
____________________________________________________________________

Val Kimmer and his crew wear incredible space suits and have an amazing robot that can move around like those Chinese contortionists. Carrie Anne-Moss does the same thing that happened in The Martian — she snags a stranded astronaut after he blasts off in a makeshift spacecraft.

But the movie is flawed, and Bogmeister lays out all the reasons.

____________________________________________________________________

Red Planet (2000)

____________




Red Planet is kind of a strange one, one of two big budget sf films that year about the red planet (the other being Mission to Mars).

The strange thing about this one is that most of the astronauts here that go to the planet are clearly mentally unbalanced to some degree, and that's very weird considering that those who succeed as astronauts in our real world have to be the most level-headed people around.

The film is also divided between two locations for the entire film; on the surface of the planet with the crew and on the orbiting ship with the lone female astronaut (Carrie Anne-Moss). The story skips back and forth between the two locales, and this weakens the narrative flow.



As far as the crew on the planet, Val Kilmer is probably the least squirrely — which is to be expected, since he's the main lead. Terence Stamp is the eldest member and is therefore the most mature, but he's taken out of the equation early.

Tom Sizemore is always a bit 'off' no matter what role he plays.

Then we get to the real nutcases. Benjamin Bratt has many anger issues for some reason and is wound way too tight. The youngest member (Simon Baker) is some kind of repressed psychotic. How and why would these two be astronauts?

The characters were presented as this flawed for the dramatic plot turns, but it's very over the top. In any case, I didn't much care if any of these guys lived or died, except perhaps for Stamp.




The Threat turns out to be a robot, usually resembling a robotic dog. It also goes nuts and chases after the crew. I don't understand why this was made the central premise of a story about going to and checking out Mars.

The whole thing takes place around year 2050, when Earth is on the verge of dying. But I didn't hold out much hope for it all when this bunch is the best that our civilization sends to save us all.

__
_______________

BoG's Score: 5.5 out of 10



BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> What's New at All Sci-Fi All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group