ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
Nothin' but pure science fiction!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Thing from Another World (1951)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9, 10, 11  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17175
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I read that the upkeep of the RKO Movie Ranch was neglected for years, and it was finally bulldozed in 1954.

Sad . . .

And since my cyclorama theory was such a bust, let's just change the subject. Here's a few other questions I would have asked the cast members if I had the chance to interview them the way Tom Weaver did.

What was the "ice" they walked around on made of? Was it concrete?

Did they shoot in the early morning mostly, to keep the actors from passing out in the heat?

How did they prevent the actors from looking sweaty in a "blizzard"?

Were they all naked under those heavy coats?

Since the background painting is on that big solid wall we see at the RKO Ranch, why does it look wrinkled in some scenes? Did they hang a big canvas over the wall?


And just for the record, this is what Robert Cornthwaite did say about the backdrop, courtesy of Tom Weaver on the Classic Horror Film Board, at my request.

From my interview with Dr. Carrington, Robert Cornthwaite:

A big expanse on the Ranch in Encino was where they built a huge backdrop which blended with the sky — at least, when you had the proper lenses on, and soft focus in the background/sharp focus in the front. It was simply done with fake snow against this huge cyclorama backdrop.


Aaaaah, what does he know? He probably don't know a cyclorama from a silicone breast implant!
Wink
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:11 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
Aaaaah, what does he know? He probably don't know a cyclorama from a silicone breast implant! Wink

Now, don't bad mouth the man, after all, he is a Doctor...Or at least plays one in the movies.

David.
Back to top
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17175
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Cornthwaite is great in that movie. I was looking for info about it today online, and I read some truly awful reviews. They said dumb stuff, like that it took place at an arctic missile base, and Carrington was the villain of the story.

I'm thinkin' them reviewers don't know a cyclorama from a silicone breast implant!
Shocked



_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:21 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scotpens
Starship Captain


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 889
Location: The Left Coast

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pow wrote:
The Planet Of The Apes tv show took advantage of the tearing down of the MGM Backlot for an episode.

As did the 1974 made-for-TV movie The Phantom of Hollywood.

Link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071993/


Bud Brewster wrote:

. . . Aaaaah, what does he know? He probably don't know a cyclorama from a silicon breast implant! Wink

Or silicon from silicone . . . Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've read reviews where they said that the movie is anti-science. I don't think so. Dr. Carrington wasn't the villain, he was misguided, and had impaired judgement due to lack of sleep. There was nothing earlier in the movie to suggest that he was a bad or callous person. If he had been in his right mind, I believe he would have been aiding Captain Hendry.

Also in the movie, the other scientists state that Captain Hendry had consulted with them BEFORE making his decisions about the alien offspring. Captain Hendry wisely used the experts he had at his disposal, for some reason most people miss that.

David.
Back to top
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17175
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll go a step further in Carrington's defense and say that even though it was kill-or-be-killed because the ruthless alien wasn't interested in chatting, Carrington was absolutely right when he expressed his regrets about killing the alien and loosing out on the opportunity to learn more about it.

But if they could have kept it alive for study, mankind could learn about it's physiology (since it's a new and dangerous enemy), and perhaps even its technology -- since they destroyed the spacecraft.

Can you imagine the way a good story would have handled that situation today? They wouldn't have touched that saucer until teams of experts arrived and thoroughly discussed what to do about it.

The movie is great, but in retrospect some of their actions were pretty bad -- and I don't just mean the electric blanket.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brent Gair
Mission Specialist


Joined: 21 Nov 2014
Posts: 472

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
Can you imagine the way a good story would have handled that situation today? They wouldn't have touched that saucer until teams of experts arrived and thoroughly discussed what to do about it.

I always admired the speed at which they accomplished things in the old movies.

In ROCKETSHIP X-M, the astronauts pile into a station wagon and head to the launch pad as a voice announces "X minus six (minutes)". They are entering the ship as the voice says "X minus 5". As the rest of the crew climbs to the crew cabin, Lloyd Bridges says he wants to give the motors one last inspection (yeah...with about 200 seconds to launch).

Folks didn't waste time back then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1872

PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scotpens wrote:
Or silicon from silicone . . . Rolling Eyes

Laughing One of the more common selection errors. It's occurred a few times at this very website, incredible as it may seem.
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
I'll go a step further in Carrington's defense and say that even though it was kill-or-be-killed because the ruthless alien wasn't interested in chatting, Carrington was absolutely right when he expressed his regrets about killing the alien and loosing out on the opportunity to learn more about it.

But if they could have kept it alive for study, mankind could learn about it's physiology (since it's a new and dangerous enemy), and perhaps even its technology -- since they destroyed the spacecraft.

Oh, I'm sure that Captain Hendry would have loved to keep the Thing alive also. But the way the story was written, the base personnel were at such a disadvantage, the Thing was intelligent, proactive and literally out for blood. It was as you say, kill-or-be-killed.

Although, they should have kept the Thing's arm and seeds for study.


Bud Brewster wrote:
Can you imagine the way a good story would have handled that situation today? They wouldn't have touched that saucer until teams of experts arrived and thoroughly discussed what to do about it.

Maybe not. If the political situation were bad, and there was the chance that opposing forces might show up, the same thing could happen. But they were following the story where, where while attempting to access the ship, they caused it to destruct.

Bud Brewster wrote:
The movie is great, but in retrospect some of their actions were pretty bad -- and I don't just mean the electric blanket.


As screenwriter and author William Goldman has written. There is a difference between real, real and movie real.

David.
Back to top
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17175
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Holy cow, the Russians! Of course! The story could involve a struggle between the Americans and the Russians to get the ship!

Wow, that's terrific. That kind of element could be used to explain all kinds of actions that would be very unwise under less urgent circumstances.

Oh, and about silicon versus silicone: I went back and corrected my initial misspelling and Krel's quote below it, but somehow Scotpen's slipped by me. As Wayne said, it's a common error.

Please allow me to explain the difference.

These are silicone breast implants.



And this is Silicon Valley.



Class dismissed. Cool

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:24 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
Holy cow, the Russians! Of course! The story could involve a struggle between the Americans and the Russians to get the ship!

That could have been an interesting movie. Captain Hendry and the scientists are battling the Thing, when the Rooskies show up. Not knowing what is happening, the Thing slaughters the Soviets and steals their equipment. Now the fight for survival really begins! Or, the Soviets capture everyone, including the Thing, then torch the base to cover-up that they were there. Now it is three sides opposing each other.

Movies and tv shows, even today usually have the ship or advanced technology destroyed. Usually with the excuse that mankind is not ready, or some other tripe. I find that short sited.

Lets say that a pristine, undamaged starship is found, so what? Even if scientist and engineers could immediately figure out the technology, it would be decades before the technology could be exploited. To duplicate any of the technology you would need infrastructure that does not exist! It would all have to be built from scratch. Your grandchildren might be seeing new starships, but it is very doubtful that you or I would.

David.
Back to top
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1872

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wait... I'm still studying the silicon/silicone explanation.
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17175
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Think of the impact of the discovery as being like the Apollo program -- people don't realize all the benefits we got from the research done to make those small fragile lunar modules and lunar landers.

So, don't think in terms of "When will be begin to build ships like this?" Instead, think of all the advancements we'd get from studying the parts, the materials, and the principals.

Heck, there are people today who say the electronics explosion that's happened over the last 60 years is from captured alien technology -- but we still don't have spaceships like the ones we captured!

(Not that I'm saying we did that. You never heard me say that. This post does not exist . . . Cool )

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Mon Aug 07, 2017 10:04 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1872

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still studying...
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1872

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another aerial photo of the RKO Encino ranch taken at another time in the 1950s (specific year not listed). The backdrop appears to be painted with all sky and clouds.





The painters' tower is positioned to the right of the middle. And, y'know... the ground in front of the backdrop looks awfully white. Do you suppose...?

_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------


Last edited by orzel-w on Fri Dec 12, 2014 5:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 4 of 11

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group