View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17637 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:10 pm Post subject: Things to Come (1936) |
|
|
_____ _____
THINGS TO COME- (1936) H. G. Wells' epic book became an equally epic movie, based on a screen play by Wells himself. In fact, H. G. Wells had an amazing amount of control over the production of "Things to Come", a situation due primarily to the fact that producer Alexander Korda wanted Wells to craft the film exactly as he thought best. Wells was frequently present on the sets during filming, actively influencing the look of "Things to Come", right to down to the costumes and set design. He was even allowed to the choose composer Sir Arthur Bliss to handle the musical score.
The direction by William Cameron Menzies ("Invaders from Mars", etc.) remains true to Wells' intention concerning characterization; the characters are presented primarily as symbols of the story's concepts. For this reason the characters seem a bit cold and melodramatic. Raymond Massey -- whose striking and wonderfully inflexible face is perfectedly suited for bigger-than-life characters -- plays two roles, spanning a ninety-six-year slice of mankind's history which begins in 1940 and ends with a fantastic future in 2036.
The story is a skillful blend of two opposing attitudes towards mankind: a dark pessimism that wonders if our own savagery will destroy us, and a bright optimism that insists we are capable of the most exalted achievements imaginable. H. G. Wells was sixty-eight years old when he penned the screenplay for "Things to Come", and it perfectly protrays Wells' dream of a technological utopia.
With Europe poised on the brink of World War II, Wells' message was no mere academic exercise. Adolf Hitler was so impressed by the film's opening scenes of the destruction of "Everytown" that he ordered his generals to view it. Winston Churchill was equally impressed -- especially with the scenes of the giant airships -- and he urged the Air Ministry of England to step up production of heavy bombers.
The public, however, was less enthusiastic. Despite the good reviews which "Things to Come" received, its box office performance was so poor it failed to recover the whopping production costs (almost one and a half million dollars) which producer Alexander Korda invested.
"Things to Come" may fail as mere entertainment, but most viewers agree that it succeeds handsomely as a vehicle for a magnificent message. At its very heart, the message which "Things to Come" attempts to impart is far above the mere technological utopia that mankind has established by the end of the story. Massey delivers the dramatic closing lines, and his words are intended to define the ambitious destiny that H. G. Wells has conceived for mankind:
"For man [there is] no rest and no ending . . . He must go on, conquest after conquest . . . And when he has conquered all the depths of space and all the mysteries of time, still he will be beginning."
"Things to Come" is a highly recommended movie experience -- especially for anyone who has lost their faith in mankind's loftiest ambitions. _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:46 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bongopete Interstellar Explorer

Joined: 17 Dec 2013 Posts: 75 Location: Dallas
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always thought that TTC was a flawed film, rather stiff all around but with some really interesting visuals.
Some of my favorites are the young child playing with his drum while marching around while silhouettes of actual marching soldiers come up behind him.
The marvelous and timeless scene on Christmas of the family and the children playing, the Grandfather comments on how much toys have changed between when he was a boy and the toys his grandchild is playing with and he wonders how they will change in the future*.
The decaying body on the barbed wire signifying the passage of time. Obviously the WOW flying wings.
*This is really outside the area of this forum...but ARE toys still being made today for kids to actually PLAY with. Or are they all computer games? WAS the nadir of toys perhaps in the 1970s or 1980s? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bongopete Interstellar Explorer

Joined: 17 Dec 2013 Posts: 75 Location: Dallas
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wait a sec....did I say 'nadir'? oh dear. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17637 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nadir - The lowest point; time of greatest depression.
I think you meant zenith.
The toy below was once considered The Most Successful Toy of All Time. Click on the link below and watch the commercial. A blast from the past . . .
 _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:04 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bongopete Interstellar Explorer

Joined: 17 Dec 2013 Posts: 75 Location: Dallas
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Bud, that IS why I commented back and said "Did I say....?"
Though I'm sure my parents thought that the toys I played with were the nadir, given how annoyed they were with all the sounds the toys made. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17637 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
One of my fondest memories is of a time when I played with a huge box our new hot water heater came in, back around 1955.
I laid it on it's side, climbed into it, and pretended it was a spaceship. I went to the planet Timbuktu, which is a city in West Africa -- but I was about seven years old, so I didn't know that.
I thought it was the planet next to Timbuk 1.  _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eadie Galactic Ambassador

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 1670
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And don't forget:
Timbuk The most stable star in the Universe. Also the farthest. And the hardest to find.
Planets:
Timbuk I — Nothing but sandy beaches, Palm groves and shallow seas for surfing and swimming.
Timbuk II — Restricted world. LOTS of Krell artifacts, so the rumors say. Open only to members of ]All Sci-Fi.
Timbuk III — Pleasant tropical world where all dinosaurs are found. (Even the meat eaters are friendly.)
Timbuk IV — Mountainous world designed for hiking, skiing and camping.
Timbuk V — (Also known as DisneyWorld) The ultimate in every kind of family entertainment!
Timbuk VI — (Also known as Magarathea) The factory world where other planets are made to order. Currently closed for business. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
orzel-w Galactic Ambassador

Joined: 19 Sep 2014 Posts: 1865
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For those of you who are fans of the single-place "Bolide" aircraft flown by Raymond Massey, I've made my drawing of it available here:
http://orzel-w.deviantart.com/art/Bolide-495646233 _________________ ...or not...
WayneO
----------- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17637 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Beautiful job, Wayne! Very impressive.  _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scotpens Space Sector Commander

Joined: 19 Sep 2014 Posts: 919 Location: The Left Coast
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent job! Does anyone know the source of the name "Bolide" for John Cabal's single-seat airplane? It was never used in the movie.
That little plane may look streamlined and futuristic, but it has a separate wing structure attached to the fuselage by a large central pylon and two outboard struts which would cause significant parasitic drag. By the mid-1930s, the most modern aircraft designs were low-wing cantilever monoplanes.
Have you considered doing ortho views of the giant Wings Over the World flying wing? That would be, like, SO COOL!
Links: https://www.flickr.com/photos/46561909@N00/15723762048/in/photostream/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/46561909@N00/15909273831/in/photostream/
Last edited by scotpens on Sat Dec 10, 2022 1:28 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
orzel-w Galactic Ambassador

Joined: 19 Sep 2014 Posts: 1865
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
scotpens wrote: | Have you considered doing ortho views of the giant Wings Over the World flying wing? |
No, that design never appealed to me enough to drive the effort. _________________ ...or not...
WayneO
----------- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17637 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
_______________________________
Wayne, I surprised to hear that the small aircraft appeals to you but the larger one doesn't. I like them both, but that's just the way personal tastes are. It's emotional, not logical.
The first time I saw the amazing (and fake) photos of the aircraft below I thought of the airships in Things to Come for the obvious reasons.
______________________________________
Scotpens, your comment on drag made me realize that another reason this unusual aircraft looks much better than it would have flown is the drag caused by those vertical surfaces.
Still, It's a beautiful plane. I still don't know anything about the doctored photos and who made them -- but they are gorgeous!
 _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:13 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pye-Rate Starship Navigator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 598
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's a Junkers flying battleship design that never got built. Even if the monster could fly, Hitler could not afford to build one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17637 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Pye-rate. She's a beauty. I thought money was no object for Adolf when it came to war machines. _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eadie Galactic Ambassador

Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 1670
|
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
A picture of the excavation machines.
A picture from a cut scene in the futuristic bedroom.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|