|
ALL SCI-FI Nothin' but pure science fiction!
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:08 pm Post subject: The Amazing Colossal Man (1957) |
|
|
____________________ I love this poster!
An army officer attempts to reach the wreckage of a plane which crashes in the test area of a plutonium bomb, but he's badly burned when he's caught in the blast.
The burns heal overnight, but he starts to grow . . . and groooow . . . and GROOOOOOW. At first the plot is a variation of "The Incredible Shrinking Man", focusing on the enlarged man's lost normality (and marital love life). But as soon as he reaches true monster height, producer-director Bert I. Gordon turns the giant loose on Las Vegas to wreak havoc on the casinos.
Gordon released a sequel the following year, "War of the Colossal Beast". Special effects, acting, and photography are substandard for both films, but "The Amazing Colossal Man" and its sequel are still kid-pleasing monster hits
The last scene in the movie is in color. Doesn't really add much to the drama, however.
Trivia note for math and science buffs: a human being who is four times normal size would be sixty-four times as heavy, because he's also four times as wide and four times as deep — 4 X 4 X 4 — which means he would be too heavy to move.
So much for menacing giants. _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Jul 27, 2022 1:57 pm; edited 7 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2016 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
I'm not a big fan of this movie, and I'm certainly not a big fan of MST3K (well, maybe sometimes . . . ), but I have to admit they had a good time with this one. And since I couldn't find the trailer or the movie to post here, I thought you folks might enjoy this.
Have fun.
________________________________
MST3K S03E09 - The Amazing Colossal Man (1957
___________ _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Fri Jul 17, 2020 2:51 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
Hey, I found the trailer after all.
________________________________
__________ The Amazing Colossal Man - trailer
__________ _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bogmeister Galactic Fleet Vice Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
____________
____________
______________ Classic Monster Movie Trailers
__________
Here is this pretty famous 'giant monster' picture from the fifties, unusual in that rather than the expected giant animal, such as insects or even apes, it's a human male.
This was director Gordon's cash-in on The Incredible Shrinking Man of earlier in the year. As Bill Warren mentions in "Keep Watching the Skies", this may very well be Gordon's best — that's not saying all that much, but hey, every filmmaker has to have his own best movie, eh?
This one moves along pretty well and is usually interesting. The title character starts out as Colonel Manning, an overly heroic soldier who gets caught in the blast of a new Plutonium bomb. This burns off most of his skin.
You'd think that would be the worst of it, but God or cosmic forces tend to play games with certain unlucky people in such films (when it involves new atomic weaponry, especially).
Manning grows back the skin overnight and then starts to . . . well, you know. The tragedy here, imposed on the audience without much subtlety, is that Manning was a good man, even heroic; yet, this is his reward.
His fiance doesn't have a good time of it either. He quickly develops a dark sense of humor and further problems — this film just piles 'em on this poor guy.
This lacks those moments of transcendence and poetic introspection in the superior Shrinking Man film, but Gordon gives it a good try, and the FX are much better than the awful Attack of the 50-foot Woman a couple of years later, even if there is a slight see-through quality to the giant man in some scenes.
One thing I've noticed in watching a film like this is that Gordon obviously is just copying elements & dialog of previous films — stuff he'd seen I suppose, a year earlier. The scenes come across as very clunky and unintentionally humorous, as if the actors are just aping older scenes, in older movies. Which they are, I think.
BoG's Score: 4.5 out of 10
BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
Last edited by Bogmeister on Mon May 20, 2019 2:01 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
A fine review by Bogmeister . . . as usual.
I was surprised that Bog didn't mention the ridiculous giant hypodermic needle. Obviously it was something that had to be custom made for the unusual task of injecting the giant man . . . but why did they put those giant "finger rings" on it?
How the hell could anybody use those things?
_________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bogmeister Galactic Fleet Vice Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 575
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
__________
One other thing I thought of is the striking similarity between the 'origin' of the Colossal Man and that of the Hulk in the Marvel Comics.
When Stan Lee or someone else writes about the origins of the grey-then-green monster hero of the comic books, the influences cited are usually Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and/or the Frankenstein story.
However, when I saw Colonel Manning running towards the bomb at that test site in The Amazing Colossal Man, I was reminded of the very similar scene of Bruce Banner running towards the Gamma bomb in the first issue of the Incredible Hulk; that issue was published in 1962, 5 years after this film.
Coincidence? :
In the comic book, Banner eventually (not immediately) transforms into a hulking giant, with lowered intelligence & a nastier disposition. In the updated TV series and later movies, the origin for the Hulk was changed somewhat, but the original is very similar to the Colossal Man's.
In the Hulk film of 2003, the Hulk at some points grew to a size of about 20 feet tall, making him even more similar to the Colossal Man.
Some more bits of trivia: going by memory, in the film, the Colossal Man is stated to be growing at a rate of 8 feet per day. So, he would reach his final height of about 50+ feet in about a week.
When we first see him at a giant size, he is said to be 18 feet tall. When he wanders around Las Vegas towards the end, some state he is closer to 60 feet tall. This does seem accurate — most of the FX hold true to this estimate (unlike Attack of the 50-foot Woman, where her size does not seem consistent scene-to-scene).
There was a film which preceded these by a bit and one I forgot about: The Cyclops (1957) — the giant in that one resembles The Colossal Beast, who appeared in the sequel to The Amazing Colossal Man. Small wonder, since The Cyclops was also produced & directed by Bert I Gordon!
Gordon was really consumed by the thought of giants, apparently. That giant, the Cyclops, is said to have been 25 feet tall, a relative shorty.
BoG
Galaxy Overlord Galactus
Last edited by Bogmeister on Mon May 20, 2019 2:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
Bogmeister shared the love that many of us here at All Sci-Fi have for pondering the connection between two separate sci-fi stories, looking for interesting similarities. _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Last edited by Bud Brewster on Fri Jul 17, 2020 1:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eadie Galactic Ambassador
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 1670
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bud Brewster wrote: | How the hell could anybody use those things? |
They got it from the CMDF, maybe? _________________ ____________
Art Should Comfort the Disturbed and Disturb the Comfortable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
For those folks like me that Eadie challenged to understand her reference — its the Combined Miniature Defense Force . . . from Fantastic Voyage.
Damn, this girl is good! _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2020 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
Thinking Outside the "Plot"!
________________________________
~ A Question for the Members: Knowing how the military wants to "weaponize" any new discovery, would it be possible to safely control the growth of a human being using what happened to Colonel Manning in this movie?
~ My Theory: By doing this they could create giant "super soldiers" in various sizes to be used in combat missions that required a specific size!
In other words, 10-foot soldiers to kick ass in hand-to-hand combat, 20-foot soldiers for ground-based invasions, and 40-foot soldiers equipped with body armor and heavy weaponry, which turn these giants into human tanks!
Imagine the FX in a movie with these kinds of GI's!
(Come on, guys! Surely it's not too much to expect a few clever replies to a great concept like this!) _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maurice Starship Navigator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 512 Location: 3rd Rock
|
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2020 4:52 pm Post subject: Re: The Amazing Colossal Man (1957) |
|
|
Bud Brewster wrote: | Trivia note for math and science buffs: a human being who is four times normal size would be sixty-four times as heavy, because he's also four times as wide and four times as deep — 4 X 4 X 4 — which means he would be too heavy to move.
So much for menacing giants. [/size] |
You're referring the square-cube law.
A 183 cm/6-ft tall human scaled up to 4x, would weigh around 4,500 kg / 10,500 lbs.
John Burdon Sanderson Haldane's 1928 essay On Being the Right Size spells this out pretty well: "...consider a man 60 feet high...Giant Pope and Giant Pagan in the illustrated Pilgrim's Progress: ...These monsters...weighed 1000 times as much as Christian [the protagonist]." 10x as tall and 1000x as heavy. _________________ * * *
"The absence of limitations is the enemy of art."
― Orson Welles |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
I'm not overly knowledgeable about this, but since we have all the facts about the results of simply enlarging a human being, we need to ponder some ways we can compensate for all that weight and mass.
After all, the same principles apply to scaled-up machines!
To pick a simple example, if we scaled up a Lionel model train, we'd get a machine which — if we didn't make significant adjustments for all the added weight and mass — could never move an inch!
And yet . . . they move quite well!
But how?
Well, apparently we scaled up all the elements in the toy version to compensate for the challenges which the large-size version presented!
The materials had to be stronger, the power of the engine had to be greater, etc. etc. etc.
We know that an enlarged human being can't simply be made of "tougher flesh and bone" and "stronger muscles".
Right?
Well . . . maybe he can! But not the same way we do it with machines
Maybe an enlarged human would have to exist in a different dimensional plane — one in which his relative size appeared larger, but the laws of physics are different for him!
I'm just throwing out sci-fi techno babble, folks . . . but perhaps keener mines than my own will find inspiration from the way I've been "thinking outside the box"! _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gord Green Galactic Ambassador
Joined: 06 Oct 2014 Posts: 2985 Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A "scaled up" human...or any animal for that matter could only function if his size was increased but his MASS remained the same. How could this be done?
Two possible ways.
One would be if there was a way to shield the organism from the Higgs field (The Higgs field...which permeates the Universe...is what reacts with the Higgs boson to create mass in the first place) Photons, for example, are particle/waves that do not contain Higgs bosons, therefore light (photons) are massless.
Two, if the atoms of the object were separated with more "space" or distance, the size could increase without gaining mass.
The only problem may be breathing could be very difficult. It's doubtful the organism could get enough oxygen into it's lungs to exist. Dinosaurs existed when the oxygen content of the atmosphere was considerably higher allowing them to attain their greater size and bulk. _________________ There comes a time, thief, when gold loses its lustre, and the gems cease to sparkle, and the throne room becomes a prison; and all that is left is a father's love for his child. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Krel Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
About Gord's theory, if he had the same mass as roughly a fit 6 foot man, then he would be in trouble. At his size and mass a strong wind or storm would knock him over, as his size would act like a sail. The big danger he would pose to regular size people would him smothering you, as he could completely cover you with his hand. He wouldn't be much of a danger to building or structures as he wouoldn't have the mass to damage them.
He would actually be in more danger, as with normal mass, he could more easily be injured. Motor vehicles could possibly injure him, or knock him over. At his height, but normal mass, a fall could possibly cause serious injury, or even DEATH!
There's a story for you: A giant man running from civilization because of the dangers it poses to him.
David. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bud Brewster Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013 Posts: 17577 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2021 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Krel wrote: | About Gord's theory, if he had the same mass as roughly a fit 6 foot man, then he would be in trouble. At his size and mass a strong wind or storm would knock him over, as his size would act like a sail.
He would actually be in more danger, as with normal mass, he could more easily be injured. Motor vehicles could possibly injure him, or knock him over. At his height, but normal mass, a fall could possibly cause serious injury, or even DEATH! |
Fascinating concept, David! You really started me thinking about this.
Consider a second property of the Amazing Normal-Mass Man — his physical strength.
We can't assume that if his mass (and thus his weight) stay "normal", and his strength does the same, he'll be able to move around at exactly the same "relative speed" he did when before he grew larger.
If the Amazing Normal-Mass Man could do that, he wouldn't move around in "slow motion" the way the special effects people caused him to do in the movie — which indicated his great size.
He'd actually appear to be strolling long like a normal person! But there's a catch.
Consider the math: The average person walks at a speed of 2 mph.
A 200-foot man is 33.3 times taller than a 6-foot man.
Therefore, he'd walk at a speed 33.3 times faster than 6-foot man . . . which is 35.3 mph.
The average jogger runs about 6 mph.
If Amazing Normal-Mass Man jogged along at a relative speed to his size, he'd actually be going two hundred miles an hour!
If we multiply 6 mph times 33.3, we get 200 mph!
Sounds wonderful, right? A Giant Flash, racing to the rescue in some catastrophe!
But wait . . . what about Krel's analysis of the Amazing Normal-Mass Man's dramatically increased wind resistance?!
Simply walking would mean the poor guy had to push against a 35.3 mph headwind. And the faster he goes, the harder it gets. Just trying to "fast walk" at twice the normal speed would pit the poor guy against the wind speed of a category 1 hurricane!
And as David point out, because his body is so much larger than normal, the 70 mph wind will have a much greater effect on him than it would on a 6-foot man. :shock
I predict that just trying to walk normally would be like heading into a stiff breeze with an open-and-inflated parachute holding you back.
__________ _________________ ____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|